This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Adds “safe parking” as an eligible activity under the Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) program, letting ESG funds be used to operate and maintain parking sites where people living in vehicles can park overnight and receive re-housing and supportive services. The change also defines “safe parking” to include providing a safe overnight place for people living in cars, vans, or motor homes and offering services to help them move into stable housing. The bill does not appropriate new money; it only allows existing ESG funds to be spent on maintenance, operation, insurance, utilities, and supportive services tied to safe parking programs. Implementation will follow existing ESG administration and planning processes at the state and local level.
The bill lets communities use ESG funds to create supervised safe-parking sites that improve immediate safety and services for people living in vehicles, but it increases program costs, risks local opposition, and may prolong vehicle-dwelling unless tied to robust re-housing efforts.
People living in vehicles (homeless individuals) gain access to safe, supervised overnight parking plus supportive services that can help meet basic needs and support transitions to stable housing.
Local governments and nonprofit service providers can use Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) funds to operate and maintain safe parking programs, lowering administrative barriers to offering targeted assistance.
People living in vehicles, including those with disabilities, may experience improved health and safety because the bill allows funding for utilities, insurance, and operations at supervised parking sites.
Taxpayers and local governments may face increased program costs or need additional appropriations because expanding ESG-eligible activities to include safe parking raises spending and could divert funds from other homelessness services.
People living in vehicles could remain vehicle-dwelling longer if safe parking is funded without tight coordination with re-housing services, delaying transitions to permanent housing.
Residents and local officials in host communities may oppose safe parking sites—citing safety, sanitation, or property-value concerns—which can create local political friction and implementation barriers.
Introduced August 22, 2025 by Salud Carbajal · Last progress August 22, 2025