Sponsors (2)
The bill strengthens national-security and procurement transparency by publicly listing and restricting AI tied to foreign adversaries, but does so at the risk of mislabeling and market harm to vendors, added costs and delays for agencies and taxpayers, and potential limits on access to useful AI tools.
Federal buyers and agencies will have clearer, actionable information and authority to avoid or remove AI connected to foreign adversaries, reducing national-security and supply-chain risks.
A public, regularly-updated list improves procurement and supply-chain transparency for private-sector purchasers and integrators, helping them avoid or better scrutinize risky AI products.
Agencies must notify OMB and congressional oversight committees before granting exceptions, increasing government oversight and accountability for risky AI acquisitions.
Companies publicly labeled as producing AI for a foreign adversary risk immediate reputational harm and lost business — potentially before any appeal or removal — which can hurt U.S. suppliers and partners.
Maintaining, reviewing, and enforcing the list — plus added procurement review requirements — will create administrative costs and procurement delays that increase expenses for agencies and taxpayers.
A narrow exception process and additional approval steps could limit agencies' timely access to useful AI tools for evaluation, research, or mission-critical tasks, causing capability gaps if approvals are slow.
Based on analysis of 3 sections of legislative text.
Creates a public list of AI from foreign adversaries and requires federal agencies to review and exclude or remove such AI from government use, with limited exceptions.
Introduced June 25, 2025 by Richard Lynn Scott · Last progress June 25, 2025
Creates a public list of artificial intelligence products or systems produced or developed by a foreign adversary and requires federal agencies to review and, where appropriate, exclude or remove such AI from government use. The Federal Acquisition Security Council must compile and update the list quickly; the Office of Management and Budget must publish it; agencies must use existing acquisition-security authorities to act within set timeframes and may grant narrow exceptions for research, testing, counterintelligence/counterterrorism, or mission-critical needs.