Sponsors (38)
The bill speeds transfer of gray wolf management from federal to state authority and reduces litigation to deliver faster regulatory certainty and fewer federal constraints for some industries and livestock owners, but it removes federal protections and judicial oversight—raising conservation risks, legal-accountability concerns, and potential costs for communities and governments.
State and local governments and regulated businesses gain faster, clearer authority and regulatory certainty over gray wolf management because the bill removes the species from federal ESA listing and limits challenges to the reissued rule.
Ranchers and rural communities face fewer federal restrictions on lethal control and can more readily protect livestock when wolves are managed at the state level.
Utilities, energy, and infrastructure projects in wolf areas may see quicker permitting and reduced project delays after federal protections are removed.
Individuals and organizations lose the ability to judicially challenge the reissued rule, removing a key legal check on agency action and increasing the risk that unlawful or overbroad rules stand unreviewed.
Removing federal ESA protections for gray wolves raises the risk of population declines in some areas and reduces conservation and wildlife-tourism benefits.
The shift from federal to state control and other legal changes create legal and administrative uncertainty, prompting litigation and producing unpredictable management outcomes.
Based on analysis of 3 sections of legislative text.
Requires the Secretary of the Interior to reissue, within 60 days of enactment, the November 3, 2020 final rule that removed the gray wolf from the Endangered Species Act lists, and bars any judicial review of that reissuance. Includes a one-line naming provision and does not appropriate funds or create new administrative programs.
Introduced January 31, 2025 by Lauren Boebert · Last progress December 18, 2025