Introduced September 10, 2025 by Julie Johnson · Last progress September 10, 2025
The bill strengthens remedies to stop and deter deceptive AI deepfakes targeting federal candidates—helping reduce election misinformation and protect reputations—while raising risks of costly litigation, expanded liability, and potential chilling effects on legitimate speech and journalism.
Voters and the general public will likely see fewer materially deceptive AI audio/video deepfakes about federal candidates, reducing the spread of campaign misinformation and helping preserve informed elections.
Candidates and other covered individuals can obtain injunctions and recover damages and attorney’s fees to stop the distribution of materially deceptive deepfakes, protecting reputations and creating stronger deterrence against malicious use of AI-generated content.
News organizations, creators, publishers, and journalists may face ambiguity about what counts as a "materially deceptive" deepfake, which could chill legitimate speech, satire, and investigative journalism despite stated exemptions.
Media creators, platforms, small publishers, and political committees could face costly private litigation defending alleged distributions of AI-generated content, creating financial burdens and compliance costs.
Treating violations as defamation per se could expand defendants' liability exposure and increase settlement pressure even in close or uncertain cases, raising risks for publishers and individual defendants.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Prohibits knowingly distributing materially deceptive AI-generated audio/visual media of federal candidates to influence elections or solicit funds and creates a private right of action with damages.
Prohibits knowingly distributing materially deceptive AI-generated audio or visual media that depicts a candidate for Federal office when the distributor intends to influence an election or solicit funds. It creates a private civil right to seek injunctive and equitable relief and monetary damages (including attorney’s fees) under a clear-and-convincing evidence standard, treats violations as defamation per se for related suits, and preserves exceptions for journalistic, parody, and similar uses.