Sponsors (19)
The bill preserves state and local control and gives industry greater regulatory certainty, but reduces federal ability to act quickly or uniformly on cross-state environmental and public‑health harms from fracking.
State governments and local communities (homeowners and taxpayers in producing states) keep primary regulatory control over hydraulic fracturing on state and private land, preserving state-tailored rules and local input.
Energy workers and companies gain regulatory certainty because the President cannot impose a unilateral fracking moratorium without Congress, reducing the risk of sudden federal shutdowns or policy reversals.
Rural communities and homeowners could face delayed national action on urgent environmental or public-health risks from fracking because the President cannot declare a moratorium without Congressional approval.
Residents in states with weaker fracking regulations may face higher environmental and health risks because the bill preserves state-level oversight, producing uneven protections across the country.
Limiting federal emergency authority may create legal uncertainty for federal agencies and impede coordinated national responses to cross-state environmental harms from fracking, complicating enforcement and remediation.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Affirms state control over fracking on state/private lands and bars the President from declaring a fracking moratorium unless Congress authorizes it.
Preserves state authority to regulate hydraulic fracturing on state and private lands and bars the President from declaring a moratorium on fracking unless Congress enacts a law that authorizes such a moratorium. One section only sets a short title; the other sets the regulatory rule and does not create new programs, funding, or duties.
Introduced January 3, 2025 by August Pfluger · Last progress February 10, 2025