Last progress May 12, 2025 (6 months ago)
Introduced on May 12, 2025 by James Lankford
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
This plan changes how federal agencies write big rules. Agencies must clearly explain the problem, their legal authority, and real options (not just “do it or don’t”), including things like using performance goals or transparency instead of one-size-fits-all mandates. For major rules, they must compare costs and benefits of alternatives, share the data they rely on, and give the public more time to comment—at least 90 days for major rules, plus 30 days to respond to others’ comments. Agencies also can’t lobby the public for or against their own proposed rules during this time, and any private meetings with stakeholders must be disclosed.
Before finishing a major rule, an agency should pick the option that gives the most net benefit, unless the oversight office approves a different choice for reasons like civil rights or hard-to-measure impacts. Agencies must also build a plan to measure results and check back within 10 years to see if the rule still works, publishing those findings online. Guidance documents must say they are not legally binding and be easy to find on one website. The law doesn’t change rules already finished or in progress when it takes effect.