This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Creates new and tighter rules for how federal agencies write, propose, and finalize regulations. It defines terms like “guidance,” “major guidance,” and “major rule,” requires agencies to prepare and publish detailed analyses and supporting materials, expands pre- and post-publication review and oversight by the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), lengthens and specifies public comment and docketing requirements, and narrows some forms of judicial review of agency actions. The bill also makes many technical cross-reference changes throughout federal law so the new rulemaking structure fits existing statutes.
The bill increases transparency, analytic rigor, and predictability in federal rulemaking but does so by centralizing review authority at OIRA/the Administrator and imposing procedural burdens that can delay rules, raise administrative costs, and limit some judicial remedies.
Federal agencies, regulated parties (businesses, state/local governments), and the public will see clearer definitions and harmonized terminology for 'guidance', 'guidance documents', and 'major rule', making regulatory obligations and processes more predictable and easier to apply.
Stakeholders (small businesses, affected industries, and the public) will have more time and better information to participate in rulemaking because the bill requires longer comment periods, fuller dockets (studies/models/evidence), and standardized public disclosure of materials.
Major rules will be subject to clearer analytic requirements (cost–benefit analysis including indirect/cumulative effects and a $100M threshold for 'major rule'), which helps identify high-impact rules and can reduce economically harmful or poorly targeted regulation.
Federal agencies, state/local governments, regulated entities, and the public may face centralized gatekeeping and politicization because OIRA and the Administrator gain significant power to classify guidance and must review before NPRMs/finals, which can delay policymaking and concentrate control in the executive office.
Agencies and ultimately the public may experience slower implementation of rules and delayed protections because stricter procedural and analytic requirements (expanded cost–benefit analysis, docketing, publication, longer comment periods) increase workload and can divert agency resources from enforcement and program delivery.
Individuals, businesses, and taxpayers could lose accountability and effective remedies because the bill limits judicial review (precluding some suits against the Administrator) and narrows available judicial relief, making it harder to stop or obtain relief from noncompliant major rules.
Introduced May 12, 2025 by James Lankford · Last progress May 12, 2025