2 meetings related to this legislation
Revises sportfishing and boating law language, adds a new boating-infrastructure priority for alternative marine fuels with related definitions, adjusts a funding formula phrase, and creates a new 3% rule that applies to portable electronically-aerated bait containers sold after enactment. Some replacement wording in the Sport Fish Restoration Act excerpt is not provided, and one funding numeric value appears as a placeholder in the text provided.
Amend Section 4, subsection (a) of the Dingell-Johnson Sport Fish Restoration Act by striking existing language and inserting new language. The exact new language to be inserted is not shown in the provided excerpt.
Amend Section 4, subsection (b), paragraph (1)(A) by striking existing language and inserting new language. The exact new language to be inserted is not shown in the provided excerpt.
Amend Section 4, subsection (b), paragraph (2)(A) by striking existing language and inserting new language. The exact new language to be inserted is not shown in the provided excerpt.
In Section 14(e) of the Dingell-Johnson Sport Fish Restoration Act, strike "Not more than striking,200,000 of each" and insert "Each".
In paragraph (1) of Section 14(e), strike " 00,000" and insert "The greater amount of either 0.0375 percent of such appropriation or 00,000".
Primary affected parties:
Vessel operators and maritime service providers: Owners and operators of transient nontrailerable recreational vessels and marina operators could gain improved access to alternative fuel infrastructure if projects receive priority under boating infrastructure grant programs. This may lower barriers to using low‑carbon or alternative fuels for larger recreational vessels over time.
Commercial and recreational fishers: Fishing communities that rely on grant-funded boating infrastructure and marinas could benefit indirectly if new priorities increase funding opportunities for alternative fuel facilities or related transport improvements.
State agencies and eligible recipients of Sport Fish Restoration and boating infrastructure grants: State fish and wildlife agencies, local governments, and nonprofits that apply for or receive grants must adapt applications and project plans to align with the revised statutory priorities and definitions; funding allocation formulas may change depending on clarified numeric floor amounts.
Manufacturers/producers/importers of portable electronically‑aerated bait containers: These businesses will face the new 3% statutory rate on covered articles sold after enactment. That may affect product pricing, accounting, and tax compliance; Treasury/IRS guidance will determine administrative specifics.
Project developers and infrastructure contractors: Firms specializing in marina fuel systems, fuel transport, and pier/berth upgrades for alternative fuels may see increased business opportunities if grant funds prioritize these project types.
Implementation and administrative impacts:
Net effect and scale:
Last progress June 10, 2025 (8 months ago)
Introduced on June 10, 2025 by Debbie Dingell
Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.