Sponsors (10)
The bill increases legal accountability for online platforms—potentially helping victims and reducing harmful content—but at the cost of higher compliance and litigation burdens that may raise prices, concentrate the market, chill lawful speech, and create uncertainty for institutions.
People harmed by online defamation, harassment, fraud, or illegal third‑party content — including children, nonprofits, and small businesses — will have an easier path to remedies because platforms can be sued for hosting such content, increasing platform accountability and potentially reducing online harms.
Platforms, courts, and businesses receive a two‑year delayed effective date to adapt policies, compliance systems, and contracts, reducing the risk of abrupt disruption and giving stakeholders time to prepare.
Removing or limiting §230 protections will raise legal and compliance costs for online platforms, likely driving higher prices, reduced services or features, and market consolidation as smaller services exit or fail to launch.
To avoid liability, platforms may preemptively remove lawful but controversial speech or broadly over‑moderate content, reducing free expression and access to diverse viewpoints online.
Higher litigation risk over online content could burden courts, increase legal costs for plaintiffs and defendants, and create longer case backlogs funded in part by taxpayers.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Introduced December 17, 2025 by Lindsey O. Graham · Last progress December 17, 2025
Repeals section 230 of the Communications Act and updates many federal statutes to remove or change references that depended on section 230. The law takes effect two years after enactment to give time for adjustment and legal planning. The repeal ends the federal liability shield that currently limits when online platforms can be sued for third-party content; the bill also makes technical and statutory changes across federal law so other provisions no longer rely on the repealed section.