Sponsors (10)
The bill increases accountability for online harms and could improve safety and remedies for victims, but it also raises legal and compliance costs that risk over-censorship, higher prices, reduced innovation, and transitional uncertainty.
Children, youth, and everyday users will likely see fewer illegal, abusive, or exploitative posts because platforms face clearer liability incentives to remove such content and adopt stronger moderation, safety, and privacy practices.
Middle-class families and small-business owners may gain greater ability to seek civil remedies for online harms (defamation, fraud, other harms) because intermediaries would no longer be shielded by §230-style immunities.
State governments and tech workers may see increased government attention and statutory updates prompting greater transparency and oversight of internet infrastructure, domain policies, and platform practices.
Middle-class families and children may face reduced online expression and less diversity of viewpoints because major platforms could over-censor content to avoid liability.
Small platforms, startups, and tech workers face higher legal risk and compliance costs that could discourage new entrants and innovation in the online services market.
Middle-class families and small-business owners may pay higher costs or lose free services as platforms pass increased moderation and legal compliance costs on to users (higher prices, stricter account requirements, reduced features).
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Repeals the federal immunity that shielded online platforms from being treated as publishers or speakers for third-party content and updates many statutes to remove or replace references; effective in two years.
Introduced December 17, 2025 by Lindsey O. Graham · Last progress December 17, 2025
Repeals the federal statutory immunity that has prevented online platforms and other "interactive computer services" from being treated as the publisher or speaker of third-party content, and updates many federal laws to remove or replace references to that immunity. The bill also revises related legal definitions across federal statutes and alters certain domain-name provisions; most changes take effect two years after enactment. The measure is primarily a broad statutory cleanup tied to that repeal: it removes safe-harbor language, revises definitions (for example of “interactive computer service” and “Internet”), strikes or replaces cross-references in multiple Titles of the U.S. Code, and renumbers or removes subsections in a range of statutes to reflect the repeal.