Ask me why this bill matters.
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Prohibits the U.S. from using assessed United Nations contributions to fund African Union‑led peace operations in Somalia under UN Security Council Resolution 2719, while allowing a few narrow exceptions. It requires the State Department to conduct an independent assessment of the AU’s compliance with specified UN conditions, to report findings to Congress and the UN, and directs the U.S. UN Ambassador to oppose Council action that would authorize such assessed funding unless an exception applies.
Defines the term "appropriate congressional committees" to mean: (A) the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and (B) the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.
Defines the term "AUSSOM" to mean the African Union Support and Stabilisation Mission in Somalia, established as the successor mission to the African Union Transition Mission in Somalia under United Nations Security Council Resolution 2767 (2024).
Defines the term "Resolution 2719" to mean United Nations Security Council Resolution 2719, adopted on December 21, 2023.
Support Somali- and African partner-led initiatives to contain and defeat al-Shabaab and ISIS-Somalia.
Support efforts to foster peace, security, stability, and economic development within Somalia.
Primary agencies affected are the Department of State (responsible for assessments and reports) and the U.S. Mission to the United Nations (required to oppose Security Council actions authorizing assessed funding). The United Nations and its budgeting processes could be affected because a U.S. veto or refusal of consensus limits assessed contributions available for AU‑led operations in Somalia; that may shift pressure onto UN member states to provide voluntary funds or for the AU to meet compliance conditions. AUSSOM and African Union planning/financing will be directly affected: limits on UN assessed funds create funding risk and increase urgency to secure alternative financing. Somali institutions and security forces and the Somali population could be affected indirectly if funding shortfalls slow AU support for stabilization and counterterrorism operations; humanitarian and oversight exceptions may mitigate some immediate civilian assistance. U.S. allies and partners that contribute to peace operations or seek UN consensus will need to adjust diplomacy and burden‑sharing discussions. Congress and oversight committees receive new annual reporting and will have more detail to shape future policy and appropriations decisions. The amendment to the UN Participation Act creates a legal hook for the U.S. to condition its UN participation with respect to assessed funding for AU operations in Somalia.
Expand sections to see detailed analysis
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Introduced May 1, 2025 by James Risch · Last progress May 1, 2025
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Introduced in Senate