Sponsors (54)
The bill pushes for trade-policy changes that could protect U.S. jobs and favor domestic producers, but risks higher consumer prices, market uncertainty, and greater political polarization around trade reform.
Manufacturing workers, farmers, and rural communities could see stronger policy scrutiny and reforms that protect jobs and agricultural income if the bill leads to changes in trade policy.
Middle-class consumers and some domestic producers could benefit from a shift toward buy-American priorities and stronger domestic protections (greater demand for U.S.-made goods and support for small producers).
Middle-class families and everyday consumers could pay higher prices and face reduced product choice if the bill's findings prompt protectionist measures like tariffs or import restrictions.
Taxpayers, small businesses, and investors could experience market disruption and reduced confidence in trade agreements if the bill frames trade failures mainly as corporate capture, making deals seem riskier.
Middle-class families, taxpayers, and lawmakers could see slower or more polarized policy responses because calling out specific presidential actions may politicize trade reform and hinder bipartisan consensus.
Based on analysis of 1 section of legislative text.
Records findings that U.S. trade policy favored corporate interests, failed to stop offshoring and job loss since 1994, and criticizes erratic tariff use that reduced domestic investment.
Official title: Calling for a trade policy that supports workers, consumers, independent farmers, small businesses, and the environment.
Introduced May 14, 2026 by Rosa L. Delauro · Last progress May 14, 2026
Declares that U.S. trade policy has prioritized corporate interests over working families, small businesses, independent farmers, communities, the environment, and national and economic security, and states that policies since 1994 have failed to stop layoffs, plant closures, and offshoring. The measure also asserts that the Administration’s use of tariffs contradicted campaign promises, was applied erratically, benefited associates, and reduced domestic investment, contributing to factory closures and job losses. The text is a formal finding — it states views about past trade policy and its effects rather than creating new legal requirements or funding. Its immediate effect is to record a congressional judgment about trade policy and recent tariff actions.