Sponsors (12)
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
The bill improves transparency and enables targeted attention to environmental justice and infrastructure risks from data centers, especially for disadvantaged communities, but stops short of binding remedies and may raise costs for operators, consumers, and agency workloads while leaving some needy areas excluded by eligibility thresholds.
Communities of color and low-income neighborhoods will be identified and receive a quantified, public assessment and map of data center impacts (air, water, energy, land, health) within 18 months, enabling prioritized attention and local planning.
Federal reporting on rapid energy and water growth from data centers and on grid impacts will support coordinated planning and best practices, helping utilities and communities prepare and reduce the risk of strained electricity and water supplies or rate shocks.
Statutory definitions (e.g., 'communities of color', low‑income block groups, and 'Indian Tribe') clarify who can be counted and prioritized, making it easier to target programs and clarify Tribal eligibility.
Stricter regulation, mitigation, or siting responses triggered by findings could raise compliance costs for data center operators, which may be passed to consumers, slow some tech investment, and reduce local economic development.
The mandated study and related agency work do not create binding protections, so disadvantaged communities may not see immediate mitigation despite increased visibility of harms.
Using state-average benchmarks for 'community of color' and a 30% low-income block-group cutoff may exclude some minority or needy neighborhoods from eligibility, leaving certain vulnerable populations without access to targeted benefits.
Introduced March 5, 2026 by Bonnie Watson Coleman · Last progress March 5, 2026
Requires the Department of Energy, working with EPA, Commerce, FERC, and CEQ, to conduct a comprehensive, interagency study on how data centers affect communities of color and low‑income communities. The study must quantify energy and water use, air and soil impacts, effects on the electric grid and local rates, economic impacts (jobs, taxes, property values), and public health risks, and deliver a report and maps to Congress within 18 months with recommended federal coordination and state/local best practices. Defines key terms (including “community of color” and “low‑income community”), requires consultation with local governments and Indian Tribes, and directs the agencies to produce mitigation guidance and a location map showing data centers relative to vulnerable communities. The measure mandates analysis and recommendations but does not itself appropriate funds or impose direct regulatory requirements on states or private entities.