Want the plain-English version? I'll explain what this bill does.
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Section 1862 of title 28 is amended by inserting text after an unspecified location (insertion point not provided in the excerpt).
Amends subsection (b)(4) by replacing the word 'infirmity' with 'disability that cannot be reasonably accommodated' and adds a new subsection (c) prohibiting disqualification from serving on grand and petit juries under paragraph (2) or (3) of subsection (b) on account of disability if the person would be qualified under that paragraph by reasonable accommodation.
Changes federal jury selection rules so people are not excluded from serving on juries solely because of a disability if they could perform jury service with a reasonable accommodation. It updates language in title 28 of the U.S. Code to replace older terms and to bar disqualification where an accommodation would enable service.
Amend Section 1862 of title 28, United States Code, by inserting new language after the indicated place (the excerpt shows the amendment is made but does not display the inserted text).
In 28 U.S.C. 1865, subsection (b)(4) is amended by striking the word "infirmity" and inserting the phrase "disability that cannot be reasonably accommodated."
Add a new subsection (c) to 28 U.S.C. 1865: "No person may be disqualified from serving on grand and petit juries in the district court under paragraph (2) or (3) of subsection (b) on account of disability if the person would be qualified under such paragraph (2) or (3) by reasonable accommodation."
Who is affected and how:
People with disabilities: They are the primary beneficiaries; the law prevents automatic exclusion from federal jury duty when a reasonable accommodation would permit participation. This increases opportunities to serve as jurors and reduces categorical barriers tied to disability labels.
Potential jurors generally: The eligible pool could expand, altering jury summons responses and the composition of juries in federal trials.
Federal courts and court staff: Courts will need to evaluate accommodation requests, identify and provide reasonable accommodations (e.g., assistive listening devices, sign language interpreters, modified seating or materials, scheduling flexibility), and possibly adopt procedures and training for staff handling accommodations. These are administrative and operational changes rather than new programs.
Trial participants and attorneys: Jury selection processes may take additional time to consider accommodation needs; courts will balance reasonable accommodation with maintaining juror impartiality and trial integrity.
No explicit funding is provided in the text shown, so courts may need to absorb costs or seek existing administrative resources to implement accommodations.
Overall effect: The change removes categorical exclusions and shifts the focus to individualized assessments and reasonable accommodations, promoting access and inclusion while requiring modest administrative adjustments by the federal judiciary.
Expand sections to see detailed analysis
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Introduced July 28, 2025 by Edward John Markey · Last progress July 28, 2025
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Introduced in Senate