Want to know what is actually in this bill?
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Prohibits Federal Reserve banks from paying earnings (interest) on balances that depository institutions maintain at the Fed. The change replaces the current legal allowance to pay interest on reserve balances with a flat ban on those payments. This directly reduces a source of income for banks and credit unions that hold balances at the Fed and removes a monetary policy tool the Fed currently uses to help control short‑term interest rates. The law does not specify an effective date or alternative policy measures, so practical effects would depend on how banks and the Fed respond.
Strikes existing paragraph (12) of Section 19(b) of the Federal Reserve Act and inserts a new paragraph (12) that addresses earnings on balances. The amendment targets the statutory text in Section 19(b).
No Federal Reserve bank may pay earnings on balances maintained at a Federal Reserve bank by or on behalf of a depository institution. This is an express prohibition on paying earnings to depository institutions for balances held at the Fed.
Primary direct effect: depository institutions (commercial banks, thrifts, credit unions) would lose the ability to earn interest on balances they keep at Federal Reserve banks. That reduces a steady source of interest income, especially for institutions that hold large reserve balances. Banks could respond by increasing lending, buying other short‑term instruments, raising service fees, or moving funds into non‑Fed accounts or investments.
Secondary effect: the Federal Reserve would lose a routine operational tool (interest on reserves) it uses to help anchor overnight rates and manage liquidity. The Fed would need to rely more on other tools (open market operations, standing repo/discount window facilities, reserve requirements, or changes to policy rate guidance). That adjustment could raise short‑term rate volatility and change how financial markets price overnight funding.
Broader effects on households and businesses are indirect and uncertain. Changes in bank behavior could influence loan pricing, deposit rates, or fees, but the direction and scale depend on market responses and Fed countermeasures. The legislation does not impose costs on state or local governments, does not alter taxes, and contains no spending provisions. Operational impacts are concentrated on the banking sector and the Federal Reserve's operational framework.
Expand sections to see detailed analysis
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Introduced June 18, 2025 by Rand Paul · Last progress June 18, 2025
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Hearings held.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Introduced in Senate