Sponsors (13)
The bill protects government entities and employees from penalties related to magazine capacity but removes capacity‑based regulatory tools at state, local, and federal levels—trading expanded legal protections for potentially higher public‑safety risks and associated costs.
State and local governments and federal employees: are protected from penalties for owning, manufacturing, or transferring magazines based solely on capacity, providing legal certainty for government entities and workers.
People in jurisdictions that had magazine-capacity limits (including urban communities and local governments): lose a regulatory tool intended to reduce mass‑shooting lethality, which could increase the risk or severity of mass‑casualty events.
Federal agencies and law enforcement: are prevented from issuing capacity‑based safety regulations, potentially limiting federal public‑safety actions and coordination on magazine‑capacity matters.
Taxpayers, homeowners, and residents in affected communities: may face higher insurance, security, or public‑safety costs because fewer restrictions on high‑capacity magazines could raise perceived and actual public risk.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Prohibits federal officers and employees and state and local governments from prescribing, enforcing, or otherwise giving force or effect to any law, regulation, limitation, prohibition, or penalty that is based on the capacity (number of rounds) of a firearm magazine. The text defines "firearm magazine" and "capacity," amends existing federal firearms statutes, and makes the rule apply to conduct occurring on or after 30 days after the law is enacted. In short, the bill would block government action that treats magazines differently because of how many rounds they hold, and it directs changes to federal statutes to reflect that prohibition.
Introduced September 16, 2025 by James Risch · Last progress September 16, 2025