Sponsors (16)
The bill lets federal law enable enforceable union-security agreements in right-to-work States/Territories—potentially boosting union power and worker pay for some, while limiting individual choice, raising employer costs, and reducing state control over labor policy.
Workers and unions in States/Territories with 'right-to-work' laws: the bill would allow union-security agreements so unions can require membership or dues, strengthening bargaining leverage and likely raising wages or benefits for covered workers.
National Labor Relations Board and employers: the bill clarifies federal authority to enforce union‑security agreements uniformly across States/Territories, reducing legal uncertainty about enforcement of such agreements.
Workers in affected States/Territories: some employees could be required to join a union or pay mandatory union dues/fees and thereby may be compelled to financially support unions (including potential political spending) despite objections, raising free-association and speech concerns.
Employers and local economies: increased unionization and required union-security agreements may raise labor costs and cause workplace disruption, which could lead to higher prices, reduced hiring, or financial strain for small businesses.
State and Territorial governments: the bill would remove a statutory mechanism for States/Territories to enforce their 'right-to-work' policies, reducing state control over labor-law outcomes.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Eliminates the federal provision that lets states and territories bar union-security agreements, allowing such agreements to be negotiated and enforced nationwide under federal labor law.
Introduced September 4, 2025 by Elizabeth Warren · Last progress September 4, 2025
Repeals the federal rule that lets states and territories bar union-security agreements, so employers and unions could agree to require union membership or dues as a condition of employment across the country. The change removes the portion of the National Labor Relations Act that has allowed "right-to-work" laws at the state level, making union-security agreements potentially enforceable where they were previously banned. If enacted, the change would mainly affect private-sector employers, labor unions, and workers in states that currently prohibit union-security agreements; it would not itself set new membership or dues requirements but would allow those agreements to be negotiated and enforced under federal labor law.