Sponsors (16)
The bill simplifies NLRB rules and may reduce agency burden, but at the cost of eroding worker protections, creating legal uncertainty, and risking broader economic impacts from weaker enforcement.
Unions and employers will have clearer statutory rules if subsection (b) is repealed, simplifying interpretation of NLRB provisions and reducing conflicting guidance.
The NLRB would face fewer compliance or procedural obligations tied to subsection (b), potentially reducing administrative workload for the agency and related federal employees.
Workers and unions could lose federal protections or remedies previously provided by 29 U.S.C. 164(b), weakening enforcement of collective bargaining rights.
Employers, employees, and taxpayers may face greater legal uncertainty about NLRB authority and processes until courts or Congress define the repeal's consequences, increasing litigation risk and planning difficulties.
Taxpayers and the public could incur economic costs if reduced NLRB enforcement leads to prolonged labor disputes, strikes, or disrupted services that affect commerce and government operations.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Repeals subsection (b) of 29 U.S.C. 164, removing that provision from the National Labor Relations Act and altering the NLRB's governing statute.
Introduced September 4, 2025 by Elizabeth Warren · Last progress September 4, 2025
Repeals subsection (b) of 29 U.S.C. 164, removing that specific federal provision from the National Labor Relations Act and changing the statutory framework that governs the National Labor Relations Board. The bill contains no new funding, timelines, or additional instructions—its sole action is to eliminate that subsection from the NLRA.