Map
Live
US Code
Officials
Committees
Legislation
Rankings
Nominations
Holds
Stocks
Open search page

Congress.wiki Alpha
AboutHow Congress WorksSupport UsRoadmapPrivacy PolicyTerms of Service

This is not an official government website.

Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.

Text Versions

Text as it was Referred in Senate
December 18, 2025
View
Text as it was Engrossed in House
December 17, 2025
View
Text as it was Reported in House
September 26, 2025
View
Text as it was Introduced in House
May 19, 2025
View

Amendments

HAMDT 136December 17, 2025Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 953, the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary is considered adopted.

Related Legislation

United StatesHouse Bill 3492HR 3492

Protect Children’s Innocence Act

Crime and Law Enforcement
  1. house
  2. senate
  3. president

Last progress December 18, 2025 (1 month ago)

Introduced on May 19, 2025 by Marjorie Taylor Greene

Sponsors (45)

Committee Meetings

2 meetings related to this legislation

House
Meeting
Scheduled

H.R. 498 – Do No Harm in Medicaid Act; H.R. 3492 – Protect Children's Innocence Act; H.R. 6703 – Lower Health Care Premiums for All Americans Act

Committee on RulesCapitol, H-313Dec 16, 2025 at 7:00 PM
View Committee
House
Markup
Scheduled

H.R. 589, the FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025; H.R. 3492, the Protect Children’s Innocence Act of 2025; H.R. 59, the Mens Rea Reform Act of 2025; H.R. 98, the End Endless Criminal Statutes Act; H.R. 2159, the Count the Crimes to Cut Act of 2025; and H.R. 421, the Small Business Regulatory Flexibility Improvements Act

Committee on the JudiciaryRayburn House Office Building, 2141Jun 10, 2025 at 2:00 PM

House Votes

216 Yea · 6 Not Voting · 211 No — 214 needed
View roll call details

Senate Votes

Received
December 18, 2025 (1 month ago)

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Presidential Signature

AI Insights

Analyzed 1 of 1 sections

Summary

Creates a new federal crime that makes it illegal to perform, attempt, facilitate, consent to, or transport a minor for genital or other bodily mutilation or for chemical castration. Violations carry fines, up to 10 years in prison, or both; the bill also prevents prosecuting victims and says religious or customary practice is not a defense.

Key Points

  • Creates a new federal criminal offense forbidding genital or bodily mutilation and chemical castration of minors.
  • Prohibits performing, attempting, facilitating, consenting to, or transporting a minor for prohibited procedures.
  • Penalty for conviction includes fines, imprisonment up to 10 years, or both.
  • Defines victims as non-prosecutable under this provision and bars religious/customary-practice defenses.
View Committee
Signature Data Not Available
Establishes definitions, exceptions, and the circumstances under which federal jurisdiction applies.
  • Covers attempted conduct as well as completed acts and includes aiding/abetting and transport provisions.
  • Updates Title 18's table of sections to include the new statutory provision.
  • Does not specify an effective date in the provided summary and does not itself change state criminal laws.
  • Categories & Tags

    Subjects
    criminal law
    Health
    children and minors
    gender-affirming care
    female genital mutilation
    medical procedures
    Affected Groups
    Children (under 18)
    Healthcare Providers
    Parents and legal guardians
    Federal law enforcement personnel
    +1 more

    Provisions

    18 items

    Makes it a federal offense to knowingly perform or attempt to perform genital or bodily mutilation on a minor, except as provided in subsection (g); violators "shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both."

    penalty
    Affects: minor

    Makes it a federal offense to knowingly chemically castrate a minor, except as provided in subsection (g); violators "shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both."

    penalty
    Affects: minor

    Creates an offense (subject to subsection (g)) for anyone who knowingly facilitates or consents to female genital mutilation of a minor or transports a minor for the purpose of performing female genital mutilation, when the circumstances in subsection (d) apply.

    prohibition
    Affects: minor

    Lists the circumstances that bring the conduct under federal jurisdiction: (1) defendant or victim traveled in interstate or foreign commerce in furtherance of the conduct; (2) defendant used a means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce in furtherance of the conduct; (3) any payment in furtherance of the conduct used interstate or foreign commerce; (4) defendant transmitted communications in interstate or foreign commerce relating to the conduct (including by computer, mail, wire, or electromagnetic transmission); (5) any instrument/item that traveled in interstate or foreign commerce was used to perform the conduct; (6) the conduct occurred within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the U.S. or a U.S. territory or possession; or (7) the conduct otherwise occurred in or affected interstate or foreign commerce.

    requirement

    Specifies that it is not a valid legal defense to a prosecution under this section to claim that female genital mutilation is required by religion, custom, tradition, ritual, or standard practice.

    prohibition
    VirginiarepresentativeH. Morgan Griffith

    Impact Analysis

    HRES-953 · Simple Resolution · Passed

    Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6703) to ensure access to affordable health insurance; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 498) to amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to prohibit Federal Medicaid funding for gender transition procedures for minors; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3492) to amend section 116 of title 18, United States Code, with respect to genital and bodily mutilation and chemical castration of minors; and relating to consideration of the bill (H.R. 4776) to amend the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to clarify ambiguous provisions and facilitate a more efficient, effective, and timely environmental review process.

    1. house

    Updated 6 days ago

    Last progress December 17, 2025 (1 month ago)

    Who is affected and how:

    • Children and minors: The legislation directly targets harmful procedures performed on minors, aiming to prevent and punish those acts.

    • Healthcare providers and medical personnel: Providers who perform or assist in the prohibited procedures (or who transport minors for them) may face federal criminal liability when federal jurisdiction applies. The law’s definitions and exceptions will determine which medical acts are lawful vs. criminal.

    • Parents, guardians, and third parties: Adults who consent to, arrange, transport, or facilitate prohibited procedures for minors could be criminally liable under federal law.

    • Federal law enforcement and prosecutors: Agencies will gain an explicit federal statute to investigate and prosecute qualifying cases, especially those crossing state lines or involving federal property or interests.

    • Religious and cultural communities: The law removes religious or customary practice as a defense, so practices argued as religiously motivated would not avoid criminal liability under this statute.

    • State governments and state prosecutors: This federal offense operates alongside state criminal laws; in many cases states may already prohibit similar conduct, raising questions about coordination, prosecutorial discretion, and potential duplicative enforcement. The statute’s federal-jurisdiction triggers will determine how frequently federal authorities assert jurisdiction.

    Potential uncertainties and practical effects:

    • The statute’s practical reach depends on statutory definitions and exceptions (for example, how medical procedures aimed at legitimate treatment are defined and exempted).
    • The law may prompt changes in medical practice protocols, consent and transport policies, and recordkeeping where minors might be at risk of prohibited procedures.
    • The summary does not address civil liability, child welfare procedures, or funding for enforcement, so implementation details will fall to existing agencies and courts.