Map
Live
US Code
Officials
Committees
Legislation
Rankings
Nominations
Holds
Stocks
Open search page

Text Versions

Text as it was Introduced in Senate
April 10, 2025
View
Congress.wiki Alpha
AboutHow Congress WorksSupport UsRoadmapPrivacy PolicyTerms of Service

This is not an official government website.

Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.

United StatesSenate Bill 1469S 1469

Protecting Children with Food Allergies Act of 2025

Agriculture and Food
  1. senate

Sponsors (2)

  • house
  • president
  • Last progress April 10, 2025 (10 months ago)

    Introduced on April 10, 2025 by Richard Joseph Durbin

    House Votes

    Vote Data Not Available

    Senate Votes

    Pending Committee
    April 10, 2025 (10 months ago)

    Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.

    Presidential Signature

    Signature Data Not Available

    AI Insights

    Analyzed 1 of 1 sections

    Summary

    Adds a new food-allergy training requirement to the Child Nutrition Act so local food service personnel must be trained on preventing, recognizing, and responding to food-related allergic reactions. The measure also updates nearby certification language to refer to the new training clause. The change is narrowly focused on training content and a cross-reference in certification language; it does not specify new funding or an effective date in the text provided.

    Key Points

    • Adds explicit food-allergy training requirements for local food service personnel in child nutrition programs.
    • Training must include how to prevent, recognize, and respond to food-related allergic reactions.
    • Updates certification language to reference the new food-allergy training clause.
    • Applies to personnel already covered by Child Nutrition Act training obligations (e.g., school food service staff).
    • Does not specify new funding or an effective date within the provided text.
    • May require updates to training materials and modest administrative time to implement.
    • Aims to improve student safety and reduce the risk of improperly handled allergic reactions in meal settings.

    Categories & Tags

    Subjects
    food allergies
    training modules
    certification
    child nutrition
    Affected Groups
    Local food service personnel
    Children (under 18)
    K-12 schools

    Provisions

    3 items

    Redesignates subclauses (II) and (III) as subclauses (III) and (IV) in Section 7(g)(2)(B)(iii) of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966.

    amendment
    Affects: Section 7(g)(2)(B)(iii) of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966

    Inserts a new subclause (II) after subclause (I) that requires inclusion of food allergies information in the training module. The new text specifies: food allergies, including information on the best practices to prevent, recognize, and respond to food-related allergic reactions.

    requirement
    Affects: Training modules for local food service personnel under Section 7(g)(2)(B)(iii) of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966

    Amends Section 7(g)(2)(B)(ii)(II) by striking the phrase "clause (i)" and inserting "clauses (i) and (iii)", updating the certification language to reference the additional clause.

    amendment
    Affects: Certification provisions in Section 7(g)(2)(B)(ii)(II) of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966
    Families
    +1 more

    Amendments

    No Amendments

    Related Legislation

    Impact Analysis

    Who is affected and how:

    • Local food service personnel (school and child nutrition program staff) will need to receive training that includes food-allergy prevention, recognition, and response. This likely means updating existing training curricula or adding supplemental modules.
    • Students and children who receive meals through Child Nutrition Act programs stand to benefit from improved allergy awareness and faster, better responses to allergic reactions, potentially reducing medical incidents.
    • K-12 schools and other institutions operating federally supported meal programs will face a small operational impact: time to deliver training, potential costs for materials or trainers, and administrative updates to certification records. The legislation text does not provide funding, so these costs would ordinarily be covered by existing program budgets or local resources.
    • State and local education agencies or program administrators will need to incorporate the new content into their oversight and certification processes to ensure compliance.

    Overall effect: The change is targeted and operational—focused on safety and staff preparedness—rather than program expansion or funding. It likely yields public-health benefits (fewer or better-managed allergic reactions) with modest implementation costs for training updates and recordkeeping.

    KansassenatorRoger Wayne Marshall
    S-222 · Bill · Passed

    Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act of 2025

    1. senate
  • house
  • president
  • Updated 2 days ago

    Last progress January 14, 2026 (3 weeks ago)