Need the quick take? I'll walk you through this bill.
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Amends Section 5 of the Flood Control Act of 1941 to require the Secretary to begin repair or restoration of specified flood control works within 180 days after receiving a repair request from a non‑Federal sponsor. The change creates a firm timeline for the federal start of work; an additional change to subsection (d)(2) is indicated but the text for that insertion was not provided.
Amend Section 5 of the Flood Control Act of 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n(a)) by adding a new paragraph (6) to subsection (a) titled 'Deadline' that requires action on repair requests.
Not later than 180 days after receiving from a non-Federal sponsor of a project a request to repair or rehabilitate a flood control work described in paragraph (1), the Secretary shall initiate the repair or restoration of such flood control work.
Amend subsection (d)(2) by inserting text before an existing element in that subsection. The specific text to be inserted is not present in the provided document excerpt.
Primary effects fall on non‑Federal sponsors (typically local and state governments) and the communities they serve. Local/state sponsors will gain a clearer, enforceable expectation that the federal government will begin repairs within 180 days after a request, reducing uncertainty and potentially shortening the time before repairs start. Communities in flood‑prone areas should see benefits from timelier repair starts, which can reduce damage risk and speed recovery. The Department/Secretary responsible for flood control work will face new administrative compliance duties: tracking request receipt dates, prioritizing projects to meet the 180‑day start requirement, and possibly reallocating staff or contract resources to satisfy the timeline. Because the text provided does not include new funding, meeting the deadline could require the Department to use existing budgets or seek new appropriations; if resources are insufficient, the requirement could create scheduling pressure or require tradeoffs among projects. Contractors and construction firms could see steadier, more predictable workloads. The missing inserted text to subsection (d)(2) could change eligibility, scope, or cost-sharing rules and would alter impacts once known.
Expand sections to see detailed analysis
Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
Introduced April 9, 2025 by Josh Harder · Last progress April 9, 2025
Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.
Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
Introduced in House