Sponsors (19)
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Increases the minimum federal share for Fire Management Assistance under the Stafford Act to 75% for amounts appropriated on or after enactment. Directs FEMA to write rules within three years that set criteria — including a metric measuring the financial impact on state or local governments — for when the federal share may be raised above the minimum. Also requires FEMA to update its grant policy so that predeployment of domestic assets by State, local, and Tribal governments can be reimbursed in the same way as predeployment under a major disaster or emergency declaration.
The bill shifts more immediate firefighting and predeployment costs from state, local, and Tribal governments to the federal government—improving response capacity and predictability for jurisdictions while increasing federal spending, creating potential inequities, and raising risks of moral hazard and administrative burden.
State, local, and Tribal governments will pay less of the cost for major fire responses because the bill guarantees at least 75% federal reimbursement and allows larger federal shares when response costs exceed set thresholds.
State, local, and Tribal jurisdictions will have clearer, more predictable rules for federal assistance because the bill clarifies minimum federal shares and establishes transparent criteria/metrics for when increased cost sharing applies, improving budgeting and planning.
Communities and responders (urban and rural) can stage personnel and equipment earlier and respond faster because the bill authorizes reimbursement of predeployment costs and eases local funding constraints that can delay deployments.
Federal taxpayers will likely face higher FEMA and federal outlays because the bill increases federal cost-sharing levels and expands reimbursements (including predeployment), raising the federal budget burden.
Some incidents and jurisdictions could be treated unequally: incidents funded from pre-enactment appropriations would not receive the higher share, and a rigid threshold metric may not reflect local variation, leaving some communities under- or over-compensated.
Reimbursing predeployment and expanding eligibility could incentivize unnecessary or premature deployments and will raise administrative workload as FEMA and jurisdictions must document and process additional claims.
Introduced September 30, 2025 by Joseph Neguse · Last progress September 30, 2025