Sponsors (24)
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Creates a new National Center on Antiracism and Health inside the CDC to declare racism a public health crisis, fund and publish research on structural racism, run regional centers, maintain a public data clearinghouse, and award grants to design and implement antiracist public‑health interventions. Also creates a law‑enforcement violence prevention program within CDC to collect standardized data, fund and perform research on police‑related injuries and deaths, evaluate alternatives to law enforcement responses, and issue annual findings and recommendations to Congress. Both programs are authorized with “such sums as may be necessary,” require Tribal consultation and coordination with state and local health agencies, emphasize data disaggregation and privacy protections, and do not set specific funding amounts or implementation deadlines.
The bill directs federal data, research, and grant resources to identify and reduce racial disparities in health and policing — improving transparency and local capacity — but does so with open-ended funding, privacy risks, and potential political, legal, and accountability challenges that could limit or delay its impact.
Racial and ethnic minority communities (and communities affected by police violence) will gain federal research, resources, and targeted interventions to address structural racism's health impacts, improving capacity to reduce disparities and trauma.
People in marginalized groups and the public will benefit from improved, disaggregated, and standardized data and annual reporting across agencies, increasing transparency about health and policing disparities and enabling better policy decisions.
State, local, territorial, and Tribal health agencies plus community researchers will receive grants and capacity-building support (including noncompetitive awards) to collect data and run antiracism programs, improving local public-health responses.
Taxpayers, state and local governments, and community groups face fiscal uncertainty because the bill authorizes open-ended spending ('such sums as may be necessary'), sets no specific funding levels or deadlines, and could create unfunded mandates or under-resourced implementation.
Small or identifiable subgroups and individuals risk privacy harms because release of disaggregated health and policing data — and expanded federal data collection on police interactions — could expose sensitive information despite stated privacy and HIPAA protections.
Schools, universities, state and local governments, and other institutions may encounter political and legal resistance — including portrayal of requirements as prescriptive, vagueness-driven legal challenges, or outright opposition — causing some to avoid reforms or slowing adoption of recommendations.
Introduced April 10, 2025 by Ayanna Pressley · Last progress April 10, 2025