Track bills, resolutions, and amendments moving through Congress
Expressing the sense of the Senate in support of Operation Absolute Resolve.
The resolution strengthens legal backing for sanctions, prosecutions, and border enforcement against the Maduro regime and related criminal networks—improving enforcement capacity—but raises the risk of higher military costs, diplomatic friction, and potential delays to humanitarian recovery.
Commending the United States military action in Venezuela.
The resolution highlights a tactically successful U.S. operation that avoided American casualties and enables prosecution of Venezuelan leaders, but it raises significant constitutional, escalation, and diplomatic/legal risks that could draw the U.S. into greater instability and reduce congressional oversight.
To direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against Venezuela that have not been authorized by Congress.
The resolution shifts primary control over continued U.S. hostilities with Venezuela back to Congress—reducing immediate combat exposure for troops and increasing oversight—while also constraining executive flexibility, risking operational disruption if Congress does not act quickly, and potentially raising transition costs.
Venezuela Oil Proceeds Transparency Act
The bill opens a path for U.S.-facilitated Venezuelan oil sales that could generate business and government-directed funds while requiring GAO oversight, but it reduces sanctions leverage and creates financial, diplomatic, and accountability risks for U.S. taxpayers and institutions.
Protecting Taxpayers from Risky Investments in Venezuela Act
The bill prevents U.S. financial and diplomatic support for Venezuelan oil projects—reducing taxpayer exposure and signaling opposition to the Maduro government—at the cost of lost market opportunities for U.S. firms and reduced diplomatic flexibility.
No War with Venezuela Act of 2026
The bill increases Congressional oversight and limits executive military involvement in Venezuela while permitting narrow intelligence activities—trading faster unilateral presidential action for stronger legislative control and raising potential operational and civil‑liberties risks.
Prohibiting Unauthorized Military Action in Venezuela Act of 2025
The bill limits U.S. funding for hostilities with Venezuela to prevent open-ended military engagement and preserve congressional control, but it reduces executive flexibility for rapid responses and creates legal and political uncertainty that could slow actions in crises.
Require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report on security cooperation with Guyana.
The bill improves congressional oversight and clarifies deterrence options to bolster regional security around Guyana, at the cost of modest administrative burdens and the potential for higher defense spending and increased tensions with Venezuela.
BOLIVAR Act
The bill seeks to deny federal contracting support to entities tied to an unrecognized Venezuelan authority to pressure that regime while protecting humanitarian and diplomatic missions, but it creates economic costs for affected businesses and implementation discretion that could cause uncertainty or politicization.
Venezuela Oil Proceeds Transparency Act
The bill opens a channel for Venezuelan oil sales that could lower fuel costs and route proceeds into U.S.-controlled accounts with GAO oversight, but it risks weakening sanctions leverage, creating legal and reputational exposure for financial actors, introducing fiscal discretion, and raising sensitive disclosure and implementation costs.
Venezuela Democratic Transition Strategy Act
The bill aims to expand and coordinate U.S. diplomatic and assistance efforts to promote democracy and humanitarian relief in Venezuela, trading higher federal costs and potential diplomatic tensions (and risks to local partners) for a chance at improved governance, human rights, and regional stability.
NOVA Act of 2026
The bill prioritizes protecting taxpayers and humanitarian assistance by prohibiting U.S. occupation or assertion of sovereignty over Venezuela while allowing narrowly defined diplomatic property arrangements, at the cost of constraining some military/diplomatic options and adding administrative and potential fiscal risks.
To direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities that have not been authorized by Congress.
The measure shifts control over the use of U.S. military force back to Congress—strengthening oversight and protecting against mission creep (including in Venezuela)—but does so at the cost of reduced executive flexibility, possible delays in crisis response, political friction, and some operational costs.
