Sponsors (33)
The bill strengthens enforcement against coordinated rent-setting and anticompetitive conduct—likely benefiting renters and plaintiffs—while substantially increasing litigation exposure, compliance costs, and legal uncertainty for landlords, proptech firms, nonprofits, and potentially taxpayers, risks that may be passed through to consumers.
Renters across affected markets may face less coordinated rent-setting and collusion, which could keep rents lower or more competitive.
Federal authorities (FTC, DOJ) and state attorneys general get a clearer statutory basis and expanded tools to investigate and stop housing-market coordination, improving enforcement and deterrence.
Victims of anticompetitive conduct (consumers and competitors) can seek stronger monetary relief, including treble damages and broader private suits, increasing compensation and deterrence.
Small landlords, property managers, nonprofits, and service providers face much higher litigation exposure, compliance costs, and potential treble-damage liability, which could be passed on to renters or reduce supply.
Providers of aggregated rental-market data and automated pricing/analytics tools (proptech) could be restricted or face enforcement risk, reducing useful market information and tools landlords use to manage property.
Ambiguous definitions (e.g., what counts as a 'recommendation' or coordinated action) create legal uncertainty for landlords, property managers, and tech firms, complicating ordinary business practices.
Based on analysis of 7 sections of legislative text.
Prohibits coordinated rent-setting and paying for rent-coordinating services, treats such conduct as per se antitrust violations, and creates public and private enforcement remedies.
Official title: To prohibit the manipulation of rent prices in the United States, and for other purposes.
Introduced November 19, 2025 by Becca Balint · Last progress November 19, 2025
Prohibits landlords and other persons from coordinating rent, lease renewal, or occupancy decisions through a third-party or shared algorithm, and makes paying for those coordinating services unlawful. Treats such coordination as per se violations of the Sherman Act and unlawful methods of competition under the FTC Act, creates private and public enforcement paths (FTC, DOJ, state attorneys general, private treble-damages suits), and limits the use of pre-dispute arbitration and class-waiver clauses for these claims. Also lowers pleading thresholds for antitrust complaints in these matters, clarifies the Act supplements existing federal and state laws, and preserves the remainder of the statute if any part is held invalid.