This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Requires the Department of Education to collect detailed, race- and subgroup-disaggregated data on suspensions, expulsions, law enforcement referrals, arrests, and other exclusionary discipline across public schools; creates a competitive grant program to fund alternatives to punitive discipline and bans many punitive practices in grantee schools; and forms a federal Task Force to research and recommend ways to stop the school "pushout" of girls of color. It also authorizes large annual funds for the expanded data work, grants, and the Task Force.
The bill aims to reduce exclusionary discipline, expand protections and supports, and increase transparency and enforcement to curb discriminatory school punishment, but does so at the cost of substantial administrative and implementation expenses, potential safety and privacy tradeoffs, and possible legal and operational frictions for districts.
Students—especially students of color and girls of color—would face fewer exclusionary suspensions/expulsions and removals, keeping more young people in class and reducing school pushout.
Fewer referrals to law enforcement and reduced criminalization of student behavior, lowering risk of juvenile justice involvement for affected youth.
Clearer protections and limits on corporal punishment, chemical/mechanical restraint, and seclusion, and alignment with IDEA/Section 504 to better protect students with disabilities.
School districts, state agencies, and the Department of Education would face substantial new administrative, reporting, training, and compliance costs that could divert funds from classrooms.
Restrictions on exclusionary discipline, limits on surveillance/arming, and constraints on using law enforcement could reduce schools' immediate security options and complicate responses to truly dangerous students.
Legal and political pushback (including litigation) from stakeholders who favor stricter discipline or challenge appearance/other protections could create contested implementations and uncertainty for districts.
Introduced April 8, 2025 by Ayanna Pressley · Last progress April 8, 2025