Sponsors (18)
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Introduced February 13, 2025 by Rashida Tlaib · Last progress February 13, 2025
Restores and expands private enforcement across multiple federal civil‑rights laws, creates new statutory remedies and fee rules for plaintiffs, and tightens definitions of protected classes in housing and public accommodations. It also bans profiling by law enforcement, prohibits predispute arbitration for employment/consumer/civil‑rights claims, imposes strict employer liability for discrimination, and eliminates qualified immunity for rights‑depriving conduct under Section 1983. The Act takes effect on enactment and applies to actions or claims pending or arising on or after that date (with some rules limited to claims accruing after enactment).
The bill substantially expands civil‑rights protections and enforcement avenues for many historically marginalized groups, at the trade‑off of significantly increased litigation exposure, compliance costs, and legal uncertainty for employers, governments, businesses, and officials.
Millions of people (including racial and ethnic minorities, women, LGBTQ individuals, people with disabilities, pregnant people, and renters) gain broader and clearer civil‑rights protections and remedies across employment, education, housing, public accommodations, policing, and federally funded programs.
Private plaintiffs and victims regain and expand the ability to sue (including for disparate‑impact and intentional discrimination) and to recover compensatory, punitive, and attorney’s fees, improving access to enforcement and financial relief for harmed individuals.
People with disabilities receive stronger, more enforceable protections—agency regulations are explicitly challengeable, reasonable‑accommodation and accessibility failures are actionable with damages, and remedies under the ADA and Section 504 are preserved.
Employers, schools, landlords, local governments, and many businesses face substantially higher litigation exposure, liability costs, and compliance burdens, which could increase operating costs, insurance premiums, and consumer prices.
State and local governments and taxpayers may see increased liabilities and legal costs (including from expanded waivers and removal of immunities), straining budgets and possibly diverting funds from public services.
The bill restricts or removes several traditional legal defenses (e.g., RFRA defenses in some contexts, common employer defenses, and qualified immunity), increasing defendants’ exposure and legal uncertainty and potentially prompting more litigation rather than quick resolution.