Need help making sense of this bill?
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Prohibits the Department of the Interior (via BOEM) from issuing any lease or other authorization for oil or natural gas exploration, development, or production in the Washington/Oregon Planning Area and the Northern, Central, and Southern California Planning Areas shown in BOEM’s 2024–2029 leasing program (document published Sept 29, 2023). The ban is statutory and applies regardless of any other provision of law, blocking future federal leasing or permitting in those offshore areas.
Adds a new subsection (q) to Section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337) by inserting the text of the prohibition and the planning-area definitions.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this section or any other law, the Secretary shall not issue a lease or any other authorization for the exploration, development, or production of oil or natural gas in the planning areas described in paragraph (2).
Defines the planning areas covered by the prohibition as: (A) The Washington/Oregon Planning Area; (B) The Northern California Planning Area; (C) The Central California Planning Area; and (D) The Southern California Planning Area, as depicted in the 2024–2029 National Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Proposed Final Program published on September 29, 2023 by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (notice of availability: 88 Fed. Reg. 67798 (October 2, 2023)).
Who is affected and how:
Offshore oil and gas companies and prospective lessees: Prevented from obtaining new federal leases or authorizations to explore, develop, or produce oil and gas in the four named planning areas. This eliminates those areas as options for future projects.
Federal agencies (BOEM/DOI): Must cease any plans to offer lease sales or approve authorizations for oil and gas in the specified areas and adjust program schedules and analyses accordingly.
Coastal shoreline communities and tourism businesses: Likely benefit from reduced risk of offshore drilling impacts, which can protect beaches, recreation, and tourism-related economies.
Commercial and recreational fishers and fisheries-dependent businesses: May see protections for habitat and reduced risk of spills or other disturbances that can harm fisheries; this can support fishing-dependent livelihoods and ecosystems.
State and local governments: States (California, Oregon, Washington) and coastal local governments may see the bill as strengthening their interests in coastal protection; the federal ban can limit future federal revenue-sharing possibilities tied to lease sales in those areas.
Energy markets and employers in oil-and-gas supply chains: Over the long term, the prohibition could slightly reduce potential domestic offshore production options, with localized effects on jobs tied to prospective projects that would have been sited in these areas; broader national energy supply impacts are likely to be small but depend on market and other supply choices.
Environmental and conservation groups: Gain a clear legal barrier against future federal offshore oil and gas activity in these West Coast planning areas, advancing conservation and climate-related objectives.
Legal and contractual stakeholders: If there are pending applications, proposed sales, or proprietary plans tied to those areas, parties may challenge or seek clarification about the bill’s effects; courts could be asked to resolve disputes over application to pending administrative actions.
Net effect: The bill is narrowly focused but consequential for future offshore oil and gas activity along much of the U.S. West Coast. It prevents new federal oil and gas leasing and authorization in the named planning areas, protecting coastal and marine uses valued by local economies and environmental interests while constraining fossil fuel development options there.
Expand sections to see detailed analysis
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Introduced April 10, 2025 by Jared Huffman · Last progress April 10, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Introduced in House