The House Committee on Armed Services has legislative jurisdiction over military and defense.
Michael Dennis Rogers
Republican • AL
Adam Smith
Democrat • WA
Joe Courtney
Democrat • CT
Joe Wilson
Republican • SC
John Garamendi
Democrat • CA
Michael R. Turner
Republican • OH
Donald Norcross
Democrat • NJ
Robert J. Wittman
Republican • VA
Austin Scott
Republican • GA
Seth Moulton
Democrat • MA
Salud Carbajal
Democrat • CA
Samuel Graves
Republican • MO
Elise M. Stefanik
Republican • NY
Ro Khanna
Democrat • CA
Scott Desjarlais
Republican • TN
William R. Keating
Democrat • MA
Christina Houlahan
Democrat • PA
Trent Kelly
Republican • MS
Donald J. Bacon
Republican • NE
Jason Crow
Democrat • CO
Jared Golden
Democrat • ME
John Bergman
Republican • MI
Ronny Jackson
Republican • TX
Sara Jacobs
Democrat • CA
Marilyn Strickland
Democrat • WA
Pat Fallon
Republican • TX
Carlos A. Gimenez
Republican • FL
Patrick Ryan
Democrat • NY
Gabriel Vasquez
Democrat • NM
Nancy Mace
Republican • SC
Brad Finstad
Republican • MN
Chris Deluzio
Democrat • PA
Jill Tokuda
Democrat • HI
Morgan Luttrell
Republican • TX
Don Davis
Democrat • NC
Jennifer Kiggans
Republican • VA
Gilbert Ray Cisneros
Democrat • CA
James Moylan
Republican • GU
Cory Mills
Republican • FL
Eric Sorensen
Democrat • IL
Maggie Goodlander
Democrat • NH
Rich McCormick
Republican • GA
Lance Gooden
Republican • TX
Sarah Elfreth
Democrat • MD
Clay Higgins
Republican • LA
George Whitesides
Democrat • CA
Derek Tran
Democrat • CA
Derrick Van Orden
Republican • WI
Eugene Simon Vindman
Democrat • VA
John J. McGuire
Republican • VA
Pat Harrigan
Republican • NC
Wesley Bell
Democrat • MO
Herbert C. Conaway
Democrat • NJ
Mark B. Messmer
Republican • IN
Derek Schmidt
Republican • KS
Jeff Crank
Republican • CO
Abraham J. Hamadeh
Republican • AZ
Improving the Lives of the American People Act
The bill broadens pay, benefits, oversight, consumer protections, and clean‑energy incentives that help military members, veterans, workers, families, and beneficiaries while increasing federal spending and imposing new compliance, administrative, and operational costs on taxpayers, employers, and government agencies.
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives honoring the men of the USS Liberty, urging the declassification of all records relating to the June 8, 1967, attack, and affirming that the lives and safety of United States citizens and servicemembers shall be paramount in the conduct of United States foreign policy.
The resolution increases recognition and transparency for veterans affected by a historical naval incident, at the risk of diplomatic strain and some additional federal costs for taxpayers.
Dignity and Due Process for Children Act of 2026
The bill strengthens due-process and legal-access protections for unaccompanied immigrant children, but does so at the cost of added administrative requirements, potential slower enforcement response in some large-scale operations, and higher legal service costs.
Delivering Priority Legislation Act
The bill strengthens support for small‑business innovation, national-security capabilities, family leave access, and targeted education/outdoor programs while increasing federal spending and exposure, creating privacy and fiscal risks, and imposing new compliance burdens that could shift costs onto taxpayers, employers, and service providers.
Veterans and Servicemembers PTSD Emerging Treatment Review Act of 2026
The bill directs DoD to study and report on potential psilocybin access for service members—potentially expanding treatment options and creating interagency oversight—while posing significant unknown health/readiness risks, legal and privacy concerns, and additional costs if access is pursued without full regulatory approvals.
To codify Executive Order 14412, entitled "Securing the Nation Against Advanced Cryptographic Attacks".
This bill would strengthen government and private-sector defenses against advanced cryptographic attacks by giving Executive Order protections the force of law, but it may concentrate decision-making in the executive branch, introduce privacy risks, create legal uncertainty, and impose compliance costs on organizations.
To amend title 10, United States Code, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022, and the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 to repeal certain reporting requirements related to unfunded priorities, and for other purposes.
The bill streamlines DoD administration and speeds internal decisions by cutting reporting mandates, but does so at the cost of transparency and congressional oversight, raising risks to accountability for projects, spending, and small‑business participation.
Abraham Accords Defense Cooperation Act of 2026
The bill strengthens U.S. and partner military coordination and regional defenses against Iran at the potential cost of higher U.S. spending, broader defense commitments, and risks of escalation and weakened oversight.
Strategic Unmanned Systems Partnership Act
The bill accelerates U.S.–Ukraine co‑development and domestic fielding of unmanned and related systems—speeding capability and industrial benefits—but increases defense spending, raises security and export risks, and creates administrative and oversight trade‑offs that must be managed.
Acknowledging and apologizing for the mistreatment of, and discrimination against, lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals who served the United States in the uniformed services, the Foreign Service, and the Federal civil service and committing to the pursuit of equal rights, protections, and respect for all LGBT servicemembers and Federal civil servants.
The bill offers formal acknowledgment and an apology for past federal discrimination against LGBTQ federal employees and service members—improving dignity and institutional trust—while stopping short of providing compensation or legal remedies, leaving recognition without direct redress and creating potential pressure for costly follow-up actions.
Shows active legislation in this committee's pipeline. Controversiality scores and analysis are AI-generated from the 119th Congress.
Stance scores range from -1 (opposes) to +1 (supports), based on bills referred to this committee in the 119th Congress. Confidence dot shown for high-confidence scores.
Pennsylvania representative
Nebraska representative
California representative
Michigan representative
Missouri representative
