The House Committee on Armed Services has legislative jurisdiction over military and defense.
Michael Dennis Rogers
Republican • AL
Adam Smith
Democrat • WA
Joe Courtney
Democrat • CT
Joe Wilson
Republican • SC
John Garamendi
Democrat • CA
Michael R. Turner
Republican • OH
Donald Norcross
Democrat • NJ
Robert J. Wittman
Republican • VA
Austin Scott
Republican • GA
Seth Moulton
Democrat • MA
Salud Carbajal
Democrat • CA
Samuel Graves
Republican • MO
Elise M. Stefanik
Republican • NY
Ro Khanna
Democrat • CA
Scott Desjarlais
Republican • TN
William R. Keating
Democrat • MA
Christina Houlahan
Democrat • PA
Trent Kelly
Republican • MS
Donald J. Bacon
Republican • NE
Jason Crow
Democrat • CO
Jared Golden
Democrat • ME
John Bergman
Republican • MI
Ronny Jackson
Republican • TX
Sara Jacobs
Democrat • CA
Marilyn Strickland
Democrat • WA
Pat Fallon
Republican • TX
Carlos A. Gimenez
Republican • FL
Patrick Ryan
Democrat • NY
Gabriel Vasquez
Democrat • NM
Nancy Mace
Republican • SC
Brad Finstad
Republican • MN
Chris Deluzio
Democrat • PA
Jill Tokuda
Democrat • HI
Morgan Luttrell
Republican • TX
Don Davis
Democrat • NC
Jennifer Kiggans
Republican • VA
Gilbert Ray Cisneros
Democrat • CA
James Moylan
Republican • GU
Cory Mills
Republican • FL
Eric Sorensen
Democrat • IL
Maggie Goodlander
Democrat • NH
Rich McCormick
Republican • GA
Lance Gooden
Republican • TX
Sarah Elfreth
Democrat • MD
Clay Higgins
Republican • LA
George Whitesides
Democrat • CA
Derek Tran
Democrat • CA
Derrick Van Orden
Republican • WI
Eugene Simon Vindman
Democrat • VA
John J. McGuire
Republican • VA
Pat Harrigan
Republican • NC
Wesley Bell
Democrat • MO
Herbert C. Conaway
Democrat • NJ
Mark B. Messmer
Republican • IN
Derek Schmidt
Republican • KS
Jeff Crank
Republican • CO
Abraham J. Hamadeh
Republican • AZ
Covered AI Prohibition Act
The bill standardizes and accelerates DoD action to remove high‑risk third‑party AI—improving operational security and predictability—but risks near‑term capability gaps, increased replacement and compliance costs, and rushed policies that may overlook technical nuances.
Minuteman III Health and Safety Act
The bill commissions an independent NAS study that can identify and recommend fixes for hazardous exposures and improve oversight at missile sites, but results will take time, may be slowed by security reviews, could leave some details classified, and may trigger additional costs to implement recommendations.
Quantum Benchmark Act
The bill raises assurance, standardization, and transparency for DoD quantum systems but trades faster deployment and lower costs for stricter validation processes and concentrated waiver authority.
Medal of Honor Access and Liaison Act
The bill improves access, recognition, and centralized support for Medal of Honor recipients and their families—making interactions with DoD easier and protections more consistent—but does so at the cost of added security and administrative burdens, potential legal/operational risks, and some loss of service-level autonomy.
National Guard Heritage Welfare Society Act
The bill lets the National Guard Relief Foundation use military space and services to broaden support for Guard members, trading modest taxpayer exposure and extra DoD administrative burdens for increased charitable assistance to service members.
Dashboard for MILCON Projects Act
The bill centralizes RDT&E facility data to improve planning, efficiency, and congressional oversight, at the trade-off of added implementation/maintenance costs, potential cybersecurity exposure, and possible gaps in technical utility.
Bone Marrow Radiation Shielding Act
The bill funds a rapid, independent DoD study to produce actionable data on bone-marrow shielding and radiation-response that could improve military and emergency preparedness, but its short timeline and military-focused setting may limit depth and civilian applicability and will incur modest taxpayer costs.
Shows active legislation in this committee's pipeline. Controversiality scores and analysis are AI-generated from the 119th Congress.
Stance scores range from -1 (opposes) to +1 (supports), based on bills referred to this committee in the 119th Congress. Confidence dot shown for high-confidence scores.
California representative
Kansas representative
Texas representative
Illinois representative
Arizona representative
