Ask me about this bill

Congress.wiki Alpha

Color Theme:

About How Congress Works Quiz Congress Wrapped Support Us Roadmap Health Privacy Policy Terms of Service

WhiteHouse.wiki SCOTUS.wiki

Get a weekly summary of what Congress did, delivered every Monday.

This is not an official government website.

Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.

Foreign Influence

Office Spending

America the Beautiful Act (S-1547) · Congress.wiki

Pros & Cons

The bill increases public-facing fundraising, transparency, and prioritization for deferred-maintenance projects—potentially accelerating repairs at sites that attract donations—but risks privileging donor-appealing locations, reducing agency flexibility, and introducing pressure on visitors while shifting some allocation authority away from Congress.

Potential Benefits

5

Visitors and the general public will have clearer, easier ways to donate to specific maintenance projects because agencies must publish donation opportunities and may solicit donations at pass checkout.
Government
visitors, recreation users, state-governments, local-governments
Projects that attract at least 15% of their cost in donations will be prioritized for Fund allocations, so more deferred-maintenance projects with private support are likely to get funded and completed.
Infrastructure
local-governments, rural-communities, visitors
Donated cash will be credited to the Fund and allocated to the agency or project donors intended, increasing transparency and donor confidence that contributions support specific sites.
Government
donors, state-governments, local-governments

Potential Drawbacks

5

Rural communities and less-visible high-need sites may lose out because prioritizing projects that attract private donations shifts Fund resources toward donor-appealing locations.
Justice
rural-communities, local-governments, underserved sites
Visitors could face pressure or commercialization of access if agencies solicit donations at pass checkout, creating a potentially coercive experience when purchasing mandatory or routine passes.
Civil Rights
visitors, recreation users
Allowing disposal of constructed assets on deferred maintenance lists risks loss of public facilities or services if agencies determine some assets should be removed rather than repaired.
Infrastructure
local-governments, rural-communities, schools-universities

Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.

Authorization

Topics & Classification

Authorization

Low controversy

Policy Subjects

Environment & Climate

Conservation & Public Lands

+0.8

General & Procedural

Commemorative Designations

0.0

Transportation & Infrastructure

Infrastructure Funding

+0.7

Government & Elections

Government Accountability & Oversight

+0.6

Agriculture & Food

Rural Development

+0.4

Who This Affects

Federal Employees

Tribal Lands Residents

Schools & Universities

Nonprofits

Rural Communities

Federal Agencies

DOI

USDA

United States Fish and Wildlife Service

BLM

Bureau of Indian Education

Sponsors (52)

Bill Summary

Summary

Changes how a federal fund for deferred maintenance on public lands and related facilities receives and uses money, expands where projects can be carried out, and requires agencies to prioritize projects with donor contributions. It also broadens how public donations are solicited and credited, permits disposal of built assets that no longer serve the public interest, and directs a report and plan to reduce deferred maintenance across multiple federal land and education systems.

Key Points

Click to see evidence

All Legislation

Senate Bill 1547S 1547

America the Beautiful Act

Public Lands and Natural Resources

6 pages

senate
house
president

Introduced May 1, 2025 by Steve Daines · Last progress May 1, 2025

What do you think?