Sponsors (27)
The bill expands immigrants' ability to obtain remedies and reaffirms constitutional protections, trading off increased litigation risk, potential legal uncertainty, and possible strains on agency trust and community relations.
Immigrants (and others subjected to immigration enforcement) would gain a private civil remedy to sue federal officers and agencies for due-process, search, speech, or privacy violations, creating a clearer path to compensation and accountability.
All people in the U.S. benefit from an explicit affirmation of constitutional protections (First, Fourth, Fifth, Fourteenth), which reinforces legal standards protecting free speech, privacy, and due process.
Immigrant communities and policymakers could see patterns of racial profiling and misconduct by ICE/CBP documented and highlighted, increasing pressure for oversight, reforms, and policy changes in enforcement practices.
Taxpayers, federal agencies, and courts could face substantially more litigation and potential payouts if a new private right of action is available against federal officers and agencies.
Unclear or incomplete statutory language about who may sue, available remedies, and defenses could generate additional litigation just to clarify the law, increasing legal uncertainty and court workload.
Labeling ICE/CBP misconduct in the bill's findings and public record could erode trust and morale within those agencies, potentially complicating recruitment and internal cooperation.
Based on analysis of 3 sections of legislative text.
Attempts to add a civil remedy under the Federal Tort Claims Act for people harmed by unlawful ICE/CBP immigration enforcement actions; exact scope is unclear due to missing text.
Introduced January 30, 2026 by Andrea Salinas · Last progress January 30, 2026
Creates a short title, records congressional findings that ICE and CBP practices have violated constitutional rights, and attempts to add a civil remedy for people harmed by unlawful immigration enforcement actions by amending the Federal Tort Claims Act. The amendment text is incomplete in the provided excerpt, so the exact legal change, who can sue, and what remedies would be available cannot be determined. If completed as signaled, the measure would authorize private lawsuits against the federal government for alleged unconstitutional or unlawful actions by ICE and CBP, which could increase litigation, change enforcement incentives, and affect victims, officers, and the federal treasury.