Ask me why this bill matters.
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Adds a new section 28 to chapter 1 of title 18 prohibiting the use of nonviolent sexual advances or perceptions or beliefs about an individual's gender, gender identity or expression, or sexual orientation as a defense or to mitigate the severity of an offense; allows a court to admit evidence of a defendant's prior trauma in accordance with the Federal Rules of Evidence for purposes of excuse, justification, or mitigation.
Amends the table of sections for title 18 by adding the new section 28.
Prohibits the use of so-called "panic" defenses that try to excuse or reduce responsibility for crimes based on a victim’s actual or perceived sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, or gender expression. The bill adds a new criminal‑code provision to Title 18 that bars such defenses while still allowing courts to admit evidence of a defendant’s prior trauma under the Federal Rules of Evidence. It also requires the Attorney General to submit an annual report to Congress listing federal prosecutions (capital and noncapital) of crimes motivated by the victim’s sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, or gender expression.
The American Bar Association has urged the Federal Government to pass laws to limit legal defenses that excuse crimes (like murder or assault) by claiming the victim’s sexual orientation or gender identity or expression provoked the defendant.
Panic defenses based on sexual orientation or gender identity or expression are still used in criminal proceedings in Federal courts across the United States and are historical remnants from a time of widespread public antipathy toward lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer individuals.
Such panic defenses treat sexual orientation and gender identity or expression as reasonable excuses for losing self-control, which improperly reduces a perpetrator’s responsibility for harm done to LGBTQ individuals.
Panic defenses appeal to irrational fears and hatred of LGBTQ individuals, undermine the legitimacy of Federal criminal prosecutions, and can lead to unjust acquittals or reduced sentences.
Using panic defenses based on sexual orientation or gender identity or expression conflicts with the clear intent of Federal law to give more protection to victims of bias-motivated crimes, including crimes against LGBTQ individuals.
Primary impact falls on LGBTQIA+ communities and victims of bias-motivated violence: the bill blocks a defense tactic that has been used to excuse or lessen violent acts directed at people because of sexual orientation or gender-related characteristics. Federal prosecutors and trial courts will have statutory authority to exclude such defenses; they may need to update charging memos, jury instructions, and evidentiary practice to reflect the ban. Defense attorneys will no longer be able to advance arguments that a victim’s identity justifies or mitigates criminal conduct, though they retain the ability to present admissible trauma or background evidence under existing evidence rules. The Department of Justice must compile and report annual prosecution data, increasing DOJ’s administrative reporting workload but improving oversight and transparency on bias-motivated federal prosecutions. The change does not create new federal criminal offenses, does not appropriate funds, and does not impose obligations on state governments; it focuses on federal prosecutions and federal court practice. Potential downstream effects include litigation over the scope of the ban (e.g., disputes about what constitutes an impermissible "panic" argument versus admissible background evidence), and possible training needs for prosecutors and judges on applying the new rule.
Expand sections to see detailed analysis
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Introduced June 27, 2025 by Edward John Markey · Last progress June 27, 2025
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Introduced in Senate