Sponsors (33)
The bill ramps up U.S. leadership, funding, and targeted sanctions to protect civilians, expand humanitarian access, and pursue accountability in Sudan, but it requires significant taxpayer funding, raises risks to humanitarian workers and non-culpable individuals, and could complicate diplomacy and commerce.
Civilians in Sudan — especially women, children, youth, and rural communities — would receive stronger protection and improved prospects for a ceasefire through U.S.-backed and multilateral measures (AU/UN/multinational force funding, expanded arms embargo, coordinated ceasefire and mass-atrocity prevention planning).
Humanitarian organizations and the civilians they serve would get broader, more flexible, and more reliable access to aid by removing bureaucratic impediments, authorizing flexible/market-based assistance, funding humanitarian operations, and explicitly exempting relief activities from sanctions.
Victims and survivors of atrocities (including sexual- and gender-based violence) would gain stronger accountability and justice measures — targeted sanctions, travel/asset restrictions, survivor-centered justice, and capacity-building for legal, medical, and psychosocial support.
U.S. taxpayers would likely face increased short- and long-term costs from expanded diplomatic initiatives, funding for multinational/AU/UN forces, and sustained humanitarian and reconstruction commitments.
Sanctions, public naming of actors/states, an expanded arms embargo, and other punitive measures could complicate diplomacy, slow ceasefire negotiations, escalate tensions with regional partners, and limit multilateral cooperation needed to resolve the conflict and deliver aid.
Humanitarian workers, local aid groups, and grassroots responders could face greater security risks when delivering aid across military lines and in active conflict zones as the bill pushes for more direct access and operations in contested areas.
Based on analysis of 8 sections of legislative text.
Requires reports naming perpetrators and embargo violators, mandates targeted sanctions, funds grassroots humanitarian and protection efforts, and directs a U.S. strategy to secure a ceasefire and inclusive civilian transition.
Introduced March 6, 2025 by Gregory W. Meeks · Last progress March 6, 2025
Directs the U.S. to lead and coordinate a comprehensive diplomatic, humanitarian, and accountability approach to the conflict in Sudan. It requires the President and federal agencies to identify and sanction individuals responsible for mass atrocities or arms‑embargo violations, expand support for humanitarian access and grassroots aid providers, press for a UN arms embargo expansion, and produce a multi‑year strategy and repeated reports to promote civilian protection and a transition to civilian-led government with meaningful roles for women, youth, and marginalized communities.