The bill increases congressional control, transparency, and budget consistency around major regulations—providing clearer cost data and accountability—but does so at the risk of slowing protections, politicizing technical rulemaking and budget scoring, and creating uncertainty for agencies, businesses, and the public.
All Americans (through their elected representatives) would get stronger direct congressional oversight of major federal rules because Congress must vote to approve covered regulations before they take effect, increasing public accountability for regulatory decisions.
Taxpayers, state and local governments, and budget committees would gain clearer, more consistent budget treatment of rules because CBO and OMB must include the effects of rules subject to the §802 approval process in baseline projections, improving budget transparency and reducing ad hoc scoring assumptions.
Taxpayers, regulated entities, and policymakers would receive consolidated data on the number and estimated economic costs of federal rules (a GAO study), giving stakeholders baseline information to inform oversight, compliance planning, and future regulatory or deregulatory legislation.
All Americans could face slower implementation of agency safeguards and services because subjecting rules to congressional approval can delay rules from taking effect.
Federal experts and affected communities may see technical, expertise-driven rulemaking politicized—Congressional approval and tying scoring to §802 could reduce agency autonomy and the role of technical expertise in regulatory decisions.
Businesses, individuals, and taxpayers could face legal and economic uncertainty if Congress blocks or delays rules, producing prolonged regulatory gaps and planning difficulties.
Based on analysis of 5 sections of legislative text.
Requires congressional approval for certain federal regulations, changes budget scoring for those rules, and orders a GAO report counting rules and estimating their economic cost.
Requires congressional approval for regulations through a revised congressional-review process, changes how the budget baseline treats rules subject to that approval, and orders a GAO study counting federal rules and estimating their economic costs. It also states the bill's purpose to increase legislative accountability and transparency in rulemaking. The bill amends the congressional-review framework in federal law (with placeholder text for the detailed rule-approval procedure), adds a budget-scoring rule that counts such rules as effective for baseline scoring unless Congress disapproves, and requires the Government Accountability Office to report within one year on the number and estimated economic cost of existing federal rules.
Introduced January 3, 2025 by Kat Cammack · Last progress January 3, 2025