Sponsors (37)
The bill removes outdated Iraq-era authorizations to reassert congressional control and limit automatic presidential military action, but it risks short-term legal and operational uncertainty for troops and may require new congressional authorizations that create debate, delays, and potential near-term costs.
Military personnel and the public: Repeals the outdated 1991 and 2002 Iraq AUMFs, reducing statutory legal bases for automatic large-scale military action and limiting the scope of unilateral presidential use of force.
Congress and federal actors: Restores and clarifies congressional control over decisions to use military force by removing blanket, outdated authorizations and simplifying the statutory framework.
Deployed commanders and military personnel: Creates short-term legal and planning uncertainty for operations that previously relied on the repealed AUMFs until new authorities or clarifications are in place.
Taxpayers and the public: Could shift costs and decision-making to Congress, producing debates and possible delays to authorize certain missions and potentially increasing near-term fiscal or operational costs.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Removes the 1991 and 2002 Iraq Authorizations for Use of Military Force from federal law, eliminating those specific statutory bases for Iraq-related military actions.
Repeals the 1991 and 2002 Authorizations for Use of Military Force related to Iraq, removing those specific statutory authorizations from federal law. The repeal eliminates the two standalone congressional authorizations that previously provided a specific statutory basis for introduction or use of U.S. Armed Forces related to Iraq, but it does not change the general purpose-and-policy language in the U.S. Code or provide new funding.
Introduced February 21, 2025 by Gregory W. Meeks · Last progress February 21, 2025