Requires a two‑thirds vote of members present and voting in either chamber before Congress can even consider any bill, joint resolution, or amendment that would reduce an existing benefit administered by the Social Security Administration or the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (e.g., Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid). This supermajority requirement applies to taking up the measure, not to final passage. Any judgment about whether a proposal would reduce or change benefits must rely solely on the determination of the Social Security Administration’s Office of the Chief Actuary. There is a narrow exception for cuts to Medicare Advantage plan payments when they are fully offset by equal or greater increases to other Medicare payments under title XVIII.
A bill, joint resolution, or any amendment that would reduce any existing benefit provided or administered by the Social Security Administration or the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services may not be considered in the House of Representatives or the Senate unless two-thirds of the Members present and voting agree to a motion to consider that bill, joint resolution, or amendment with the provision included.
Subsection (a)’s two-thirds consideration requirement does not apply to any provision that would reduce a payment made to a Medicare Advantage plan under part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act, but only if the provision would, if enacted, increase payments for other purposes under title XVIII by an amount equal to or greater than the reduction in the Medicare Advantage payment.
During consideration of a bill, joint resolution, or amendment in the House of Representatives or the Senate, any determination about whether the provision would (1) result in a reduction described in section 2(a) or (2) result in a reduction or increase described in section 2(b) must be made solely on the basis of a determination by the Office of the Chief Actuary of the Social Security Administration.
Last progress March 6, 2025 (10 months ago)
Introduced on March 6, 2025 by Mark Pocan
Referred to the House Committee on Rules.