Sponsors (111)
The bill aims to reduce harmful enforcement practices and increase transparency and local control, but its reliance on nonbinding directives, narrow exceptions, resource needs, and privacy risks mean protections may be uneven and could be undermined in practice.
Immigrants, bystanders, protesters, and law-enforcement encounters will face required de-escalation and proportional/least-restrictive force and bans on routine use of crowd-control tools, likely reducing injuries and harmful exposures during enforcement operations.
Immigrants and federal enforcement personnel will have greater accountability because default-on body-worn and vehicle cameras plus duty-to-intervene and reporting rules increase evidence collection and create internal checks against excessive or unlawful force.
Designated immigration personnel must identify themselves at arrests and officers are directed to refuse blatantly illegal or unsafe orders, improving transparency and reducing wrongful detentions and unlawful commands.
Many directives are nonbinding or risk being implemented only as regulatory wording changes without added resources or oversight, meaning communities may not see consistent or enforceable protections in practice.
Narrow exceptions for national-security or public-safety uses could be interpreted broadly, allowing banned crowd-control tools and aggressive tactics to be reintroduced in practice.
New notice, reporting, and coordination rules and the choice for local agencies not to participate could slow time-sensitive operations or reduce federal-local coordination, complicating rapid responses and public-safety planning.
Based on analysis of 4 sections of legislative text.
Limits and governs use of force by federal immigration enforcement, mandates cameras, bans certain crowd‑control weapons, requires training, reporting, and accountability.
Sets limits and procedures for how federal immigration enforcement officers may use force. It generally bars deadly force except when necessary to protect life, requires de‑escalation and consideration of age/disability, creates duties to intervene and report, bans certain crowd‑control weapons except in narrow, supervised situations, and requires body and vehicle camera policies, training, data collection, and regular reports to Congress.
Introduced November 7, 2025 by Scott Peters · Last progress November 7, 2025