Track bills, resolutions, and amendments moving through Congress
Pay Our Homeland Defenders Act
The bill increases transparency, oversight, and predictability for DHS spending and grants and protects certain workforce and enforcement capacities, but it imposes substantial reporting requirements, financial penalties, and statutory limits that reduce agency flexibility, may divert funds from infrastructure and operations, and could constrain operational options and oversight norms.
Further Additional Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026
The bill increases DHS transparency, detainee protections, targeted operational funding, and training controls—but it also imposes heavy new oversight/reporting rules, procurement and operational limits, and some rescissions that could slow emergency response, raise administrative costs, and reduce program flexibility.
Fighting Foreign Illegal Seafood Harvests Act of 2025
The bill strengthens U.S. tools, data, and international cooperation to reduce illegal fishing and forced labor—bolstering fisheries sustainability and supply‑chain integrity—but does so at the cost of higher enforcement and diplomatic risks, greater compliance burdens for seafood businesses, and increased federal spending.
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2026
The bill increases transparency, short‑term funding continuity, and implementation clarity while imposing new reporting and procedural controls that raise administrative costs, constrain agency flexibility, and add fiscal and operational trade‑offs that will largely fall on taxpayers and frontline,急
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026
This bill combines substantial new funding priorities for defense, foreign assistance, health, and infrastructure with broad transparency and accountability measures — but does so while imposing many reporting requirements, limits on agency flexibility, rescissions, and compliance costs that raise spending pressures, could slow rapid responses, and shift burdens onto agencies, providers, and recipients.
Kayla Hamilton Act
The bill increases safety and legal clarity for unaccompanied children through stricter vetting and immediate statutory placement rules, but does so at the cost of shrinking sponsor options, causing delays and administrative burdens, reducing agency flexibility, and weakening procedural transparency and public oversight.
No Immigration Benefits for Hamas Terrorists Act of 2025
Combatting International Drug Trafficking and Human Smuggling Partnership Act of 2025
The bill expands CBP's ability to operate and provide humanitarian assistance abroad and to compensate some foreign victims, aiming to strengthen regional security, but it exposes U.S. personnel and taxpayers to legal, financial, and continuity risks while limiting long-term remedy access for some claimants.
Syria Terrorism Threat Assessment Act
The bill forces a rapid, detailed DHS assessment to improve tracking and vetting of Syria-based terrorist affiliates—strengthening threat awareness and congressional oversight—but may strain agency resources, risk disclosure of sensitive intelligence, and lead to stricter screening for travelers and immigrants.
Stop Illegal Entry Act of 2025
The bill strengthens enforcement by imposing harsher penalties and centralizing authority to reduce recidivism and improve prosecutorial clarity, but it significantly expands criminal exposure for noncitizens—raising civil‑liberties and justice concerns, increasing taxpayer costs, and straining courts and prisons.
Illegal Red Snapper and Tuna Enforcement Act
To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14.
This package delivers sizable tax relief, defense/industrial and targeted domestic investments while tightening immigration and benefit rules and expanding fossil fuel development — producing near‑term financial and program gains for many Americans at the cost of higher federal spending, greater compliance burdens, and increased risks to climate, coverage, and immigrant access.
Secure Our Ports Act of 2025
The bill strengthens U.S. control over port operations to reduce foreign strategic influence and protect supply chains, but does so at the cost of limiting foreign investment and competition, which may raise costs, create compliance uncertainty, and risk diplomatic backlash.
To direct the Commandant of the Coast Guard to update the policy of the Coast Guard regarding the use of medication to treat drug overdose, and for other purposes.
The bill improves maritime safety and Coast Guard readiness by clarifying onboard drug offenses and expanding naloxone access and oversight, but it risks narrowing prosecutorial reach, adding costs, raising privacy concerns, and leaving some units with inadequate naloxone access.
SHIELD Against CCP Act
The bill centralizes and clarifies federal coordination, transparency, and technology efforts to address CCP-related threats—strengthening preparedness and interagency response—while increasing costs, information-sharing, and risks to privacy and potentially targeted communities.
Subterranean Border Defense Act
The bill increases reporting to strengthen detection and response to cross-border tunnels for law enforcement and border communities, at the cost of added federal administrative burden and a risk of revealing sensitive operational details.
Decoupling from Foreign Adversarial Battery Dependence Act
Agent Raul Gonzalez Officer Safety Act
This bill strengthens federal enforcement, protections for border-area policing, and transparency for prosecutions of vehicle-evading conduct, but it expands federal criminal and immigration consequences — including use of admissions, mandatory penalties, and a wide geographic scope — that raise civil‑liberty risks, costs, and burdens on courts and immigration systems.
HALT Fentanyl Act
The bill tightens and expedites federal control and prosecution of fentanyl analogues to deter trafficking and speed enforcement, while attempting to facilitate regulated research and clarify law — but it raises substantial risks to research access, civil liberties, business and enforcement costs, and oversight that may shift harms or create legal uncertainty.
Laken Riley Act
The bill strengthens federal detention authority and gives states new tools to force federal immigration enforcement—potentially improving public safety and state-level remedies—but does so at the cost of broader mandatory detention, higher taxpayer and agency expenses, more litigation, court delays, and risks to due-process and nationwide enforcement consistency.
Expressing support for the designation of February 23, 2025, to March 1, 2025, as "National Fentanyl Awareness Week" and raising awareness of the negative impacts of fentanyl in the United States.
The resolution raises important public- and policymaker awareness about the severe risks of fentanyl and supports calls for action, but as a findings-only text it provides no direct services and risks increasing stigma or shifting attention toward border-focused responses rather than expanding domestic treatment and harm-reduction.
Condemning attacks on Federal law enforcement in the State of Illinois.
The resolution strengthens and clarifies federal immigration enforcement authority to support deportations and prioritize action in high-crime areas, while trading off local control, increasing risks of confrontations and community harm, and risking resource diversion and strained federal-local relations.
An original resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that the President of the United States possesses legal authority under existing law to take immediate and necessary action to secure the southwest border of the United States.
The bill gives the executive branch stronger legal and operational tools to limit asylum claims and return applicants to neighboring countries—potentially easing border pressures and administrative costs but at the cost of reduced access to asylum and increased humanitarian and legal risks.
Commending Federal, State, and local law enforcement for their efforts in protecting Americans by combating drug trafficking and agroterrorism and for their recent actions in Kansas and across the country.
The resolution highlights and supports interdiction and biosecurity successes that can protect public health and agriculture and justify continued enforcement resources, but its alarmist framing risks civil‑liberty tradeoffs, stigmatizing immigrants, and could be used to prioritize costly enforcement over treatment and prevention.
To direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities that have not been authorized by Congress.
The resolution strengthens Congressional control, transparency, and legal limits on presidential use of force—reducing risks of unilateral or unauthorized military action—while making it harder for the Executive to act quickly against emerging threats and possibly increasing political, operational, and fiscal burdens.
Customs Facilitation Act of 2025
The bill modernizes and streamlines customs processing—boosting trade efficiency, cash flow for eligible traders, and security through better data—while shifting costs and new compliance, data‑privacy, and governance risks onto small businesses, taxpayers, and oversight processes.
Joint Task Force to Counter Illicit Synthetic Narcotics Act of 2025
The bill centralizes and strengthens federal coordination, leadership, and operational capacity to disrupt synthetic‑opioid supply chains and improve information‑sharing—potentially reducing overdoses—but does so with higher federal costs, greater federal control over local responses, civil‑liberties and privacy risks, and possible diplomatic consequences.
FARMLAND Act of 2025
The bill strengthens national-security, food-safety, and enforcement oversight of foreign ownership of U.S. agricultural land—improving transparency and enforcement capacity—but does so at the cost of higher compliance burdens, privacy and reputational risks, potential chilling of legitimate foreign investment, and new financial risks for landowners and program participants.
Northern Border Security Enhancement and Review Act
The bill increases Northern Border threat analysis, strategy updates, and oversight to improve targeting and accountability, but it bars new funding and adds reporting requirements—raising the risk that intended programs go underfunded, operations bear added administrative costs, and sensitive data could be exposed.
No Hezbollah In Our Hemisphere Act
The bill strengthens tools to detect and disrupt terrorist networks in Latin America and improves information and oversight for U.S. policymakers, but it risks diplomatic friction, economic costs, civil‑liberties impacts, and governance gaps—creating a trade‑off between short‑term security leverage and longer‑term diplomatic, economic, and accountability consequences.