341 Legislation
Illegal Red Snapper and Tuna Enforcement Act
35%Ocean & MarineDefense SpendingForeign Aid & DevelopmentNat'l Security- senate
Track bills, resolutions, and amendments moving through Congress
Illegal Red Snapper and Tuna Enforcement Act
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027
The bill substantially strengthens U.S. military readiness, technological defenses, service member benefits, and industrial resilience but does so at the cost of materially higher federal spending, expanded administrative and reporting burdens, procurement and privacy tradeoffs, and several provisions that raise legal and implementation risks.
Establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2027 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2028 through 2036.
The resolution provides clearer, multi‑year budget guidance and funding signals that improve planning for defense and key domestic programs, but it also locks in targets and procedural powers that could force future cuts, reduce oversight, and leave uncertainty because guidance is not the same as appropriations.
Value Over Cost Act of 2026
The bill lets federal buyers prioritize mission fit and quality over lowest price—potentially improving program outcomes—at the expense of higher procurement costs, reduced price-based competition, and more centralized procurement authority.
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2027
The bill preserves continuity of many federal programs, benefits, and emergency responses in the short term—avoiding service disruptions and furloughs—but does so by increasing near‑term federal spending and narrowing congressional timing and oversight, creating trade-offs for budget deficits, transparency, readiness planning, and some programmatic priorities.
Homeland Security Capabilities Preservation Reporting Act of 2026
The bill aims to make it easier for the Defense Department to carry out programs for military and federal personnel, but does so at the risk of legal ambiguity and potentially higher defense spending that would fall on taxpayers.
Ukraine Support Act
This bill sharply expands U.S. diplomatic, financial, military, and economic tools to support Ukraine and pressure Russia—strengthening allied security and accountability—but does so at increased fiscal cost, elevated geopolitical and economic risks, and with added administrative and political constraints on executive action.
Setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2026 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2027 through 2035.
The resolution increases multi-year budget predictability and speeds some budget processes (helping defense, certain agencies, and reconciliation-driven priorities) but does so by locking in ceilings and concentrating procedural power in ways that reduce flexibility, oversight, and could constrain investments or rights protections.
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026
The bill boosts oversight, targeted defense and foreign-aid investments, and health and program transparency, but does so by locking funds into many earmarks and reporting mandates that increase administrative costs, reduce executive flexibility, raise near‑term taxpayer obligations, and constrain federal personnel and agency responsiveness.
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026
The bill ramps up U.S. defense, maritime, and diplomatic capabilities and invests in domestic industrial resilience and service member support, but does so through large new spending, pervasive reporting mandates, procurement shifts, and authorities that raise taxpayer costs, administrative burdens, privacy risks, and some national‑security tradeoffs.
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026
The bill prioritizes a broad strengthening of U.S. defense, industrial capacity, allied partnerships, and domestic housing/disaster programs—delivering tangible benefits to service members, veterans, and vulnerable communities—while imposing substantial new spending, administrative burdens, supply‑chain/research restrictions, and civil‑liberties and environmental tradeoffs for Americans.
Streamlining Procurement for Effective Execution and Delivery and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026
The bill makes large, targeted investments to strengthen military readiness, domestic industrial capacity, technology adoption, and service‑member supports, but does so at the cost of substantial new spending, heavier administrative and compliance burdens, limits on certain rights and research collaborations, and risks of market distortions or implementation/operational tradeoffs.
Military Construction and Veterans Affairs, Agriculture, and Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2026
The bill preserves and funds major veteran, nutrition, and agency operations while increasing congressional oversight and imposing procurement, reporting, and program restrictions that could slow agency responsiveness, raise costs, and limit flexibility.
Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2025
The bill invests significantly in Coast Guard capacity, safety, victim support, oversight, and modernization—but those gains come with higher federal costs, substantial new administrative requirements, privacy and readiness risks, and potential compliance burdens for mariners and partners.
Strategic Ports Reporting Act
The bill gives federal and state policymakers better, regularly updated visibility into ports tied to PRC actors—improving national-security planning and options to secure supply chains—at the cost of added federal expense, potential operational disruption for ports and businesses, and risks that public disclosures or designations could reveal vulnerabilities or strain diplomacy.
MEGOBARI Act
The bill seeks to push Georgia toward stronger democracy and Euro‑Atlantic integration by combining conditional assistance, targeted sanctions, and heightened oversight—strengthening democratic institutions and U.S. leverage but risking reduced cooperation, economic and security backlash, administrative strain, and uncertain program continuity.
Establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034.
The resolution seeks to impose multi‑year fiscal discipline and procedural clarity—potentially lowering deficits and improving planning—but does so by centralizing budget power and rigid targets that risk benefit cuts, reduced congressional flexibility, and weakened protections for workers, consumers, and the environment.
Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025
The bill funds a wide range of government, defense, veterans, health, and infrastructure programs to avoid service disruptions and maintain near‑term public safety and benefits, but does so with sizable supplemental spending, short-term extensions, expanded waiver authorities, and reduced fiscal/oversight constraints that raise deficit risk and limit long‑term certainty and congressional control.
Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2025
The bill boosts Coast Guard capacity, personnel supports, victim protections, and maritime/infrastructure modernization—but does so at the cost of substantial new spending, added administrative burdens, and some tradeoffs in privacy, oversight, and regulatory flexibility.
Safe and Smart Federal Purchasing Act
The bill trades a timely, congressionally directed review that could protect national security and improve contracting quality against higher procurement costs for taxpayers, disruption for contractors, and extra administrative work for agencies.
An original concurrent resolution setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034.
The resolution gives Congress and agencies a clearer multi-year budgeting roadmap and specific baselines (notably for defense, Medicare, and Social Security) that improve planning and some targeted protections, but it also tightens numeric constraints, expands procedural powers, and raises baseline spending in ways that could increase deficits, reduce flexibility, and politicize allocations.
Expressing the sense of the Senate that member countries of NATO must commit at least 2 percent of their national gross domestic product to national defense spending to hold leadership or benefit at the expense of those countries who meet their obligations.
The resolution encourages NATO allies to increase defense spending to strengthen collective security and reduce U.S. burden, but that shift can raise costs for taxpayers either in the U.S. or in allied countries and force tradeoffs with domestic programs.
Recognizing the 74th anniversary of the signing of the Mutual Defense Treaty between the United States and the Philippines and the strong bilateral security alliance between our two nations in the wake of escalating aggression and political lawfare by the People's Republic of China in the South China Sea.
The resolution strengthens U.S.-Philippine defense cooperation to deter regional threats and improve readiness and disaster response, at the cost of higher fiscal commitments, potential strain on U.S.-China relations, and increased local sovereignty and environmental concerns for host communities.
Urging all members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization to spend a minimum of 5 percent of gross domestic product on defense.
The resolution pushes NATO allies to raise defense spending to strengthen readiness, cyber resilience, and accountability, but it raises risks of higher taxpayer costs, pressure on domestic services, and strain on smaller allied economies and political cohesion.
Celebrating the June 2025 North Atlantic Treaty Organization Summit in the Hague, the Netherlands, and reaffirming priorities pertaining to transatlantic security and our commitment to NATO.
The resolution strengthens NATO coordination, deterrence, and protection of critical infrastructure—bolstering regional and allied security—but does so at the cost of higher defense spending, potential escalation risks, possible tradeoffs with domestic programs, and increased civil liberties concerns.
Condemning Russia's devastating aerial bombardment on the people of Ukraine, particularly the use of increasingly advanced ballistic missiles, and expressing support for securing more air defense systems.
The resolution aims to protect Ukrainians and enable targeted action by documenting transfers and supporting stronger air defenses, but it also raises risks of increased U.S. defense spending, escalation with Russia, and diplomatic complications.
Recognizing the 4th anniversary of the Trump administration's Secretary of the Air Force announcing Redstone Arsenal in Huntsville, Alabama, as the preferred location for United States Space Command Headquarters.
The resolution bolsters Huntsville's claim by documenting Redstone Arsenal's top ranking—potentially unlocking investment and clearer basing precedent—but it also reopens a contested decision that could trigger legal/political disputes and transition costs, especially for Colorado Springs.
Setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2026 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2027 through 2035.
The resolution enforces multi-year fiscal discipline, transparency, and higher consensus thresholds to reduce waste and stabilize planning, but does so at the cost of reduced short-term flexibility, concentrated procedural power, and a real risk of higher long-term deficits or cuts to specific programs.
Buying Faster than the Enemy Act of 2025
The bill speeds and simplifies DoD procurement—potentially delivering capabilities faster and broadening commercial participation—but increases risks of reduced competition, concentrated decision authority, administrative transition costs, and readiness or oversight gaps unless paired with strong safeguards.
Arsenal Workload Sustainment Act
The bill shifts more work to Army arsenals and benefits partner firms and arsenal workers while increasing transparency, but it reduces competitive opportunities for non-partner firms and risks higher costs and reduced private-sector flexibility for taxpayers.
