Track bills, resolutions, and amendments moving through Congress
Condemning the dictator of the People's Republic of China, Xi Jinping, for deceit, undermining prospects for peace and security, and orchestrating crimes against humanity.
The resolution raises U.S. awareness and policy pressure on alleged PRC human-rights abuses, cyber threats, narcotics trafficking, and environmental harms—potentially improving safety and accountability—but does so in language that risks diplomatic retaliation, economic disruption, and increased domestic xenophobia.
Block the Use of Transatlantic Technology in Iranian Made Drones Act
The bill strengthens U.S. and allied efforts to choke off Iran's access to drone components and improves export-control coordination—boosting security—but does so by increasing regulatory and compliance burdens, administrative costs, and some risks to transparency and geopolitical escalation.
Ukraine Support Act
The bill increases U.S. and allied support for Ukraine and tightens sanctions and oversight—boosting deterrence, financing options, and policy clarity—but does so with meaningful fiscal costs, higher risks of escalation and disruption for businesses, and added administrative and operational burdens.
Federal Building Threat Notification Act
The bill standardizes life‑safety communications and assigns on‑site accountability to improve federal building safety and responder coordination, but it requires staff time and local implementation capacity that may produce uneven protection and short-term operational costs.
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026
The bill boosts oversight, targeted defense and foreign-aid investments, and health and program transparency, but does so by locking funds into many earmarks and reporting mandates that increase administrative costs, reduce executive flexibility, raise near‑term taxpayer obligations, and constrain federal personnel and agency responsiveness.
Breaking the Gridlock Act
The bill advances consumer privacy, oversight, veteran supports, emergency response fixes, and symbolic national heritage while imposing new administrative duties, regulatory and procurement burdens, and additional federal costs that shift trade‑offs between stronger protections/accountability and higher taxpayer and public‑sector implementation burdens.
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026
The bill substantially strengthens U.S. defense, industrial, and partner capabilities and boosts benefits for service members, but it does so with large new spending commitments, added administrative mandates, and trade‑offs in flexibility, industry costs, privacy, and implementation complexity.
Federal Maritime Commission Reauthorization Act of 2025
The bill strengthens FMC oversight, stakeholder input, data protections, and near-term port funding while increasing confidentiality barriers and compliance requirements that could reduce transparency, impose costs on smaller shippers and carriers, and concentrate agency discretion.
Enhancing Stakeholder Support and Outreach for Preparedness Grants Act
The bill increases outreach, transparency, and oversight to help governments and first responders secure better-targeted homeland security grants, but imposes administrative costs, potential delays in visible benefits, and extra burdens on smaller jurisdictions.
Generative AI Terrorism Risk Assessment Act
The bill improves federal and local awareness, transparency, and coordination to address GenAI-enabled terrorist threats—strengthening preparedness and enabling countermeasures—while risking resource diversion, civil‑liberties concerns, operational exposure, and limited follow-through without dedicated funding.
Syria Terrorism Threat Assessment Act
The bill improves near-term U.S. situational awareness and accountability on terrorism threats from Syria but risks civil‑liberty/privacy harms for immigrants and operational strain on DHS if safeguards and staffing needs are not addressed.
DHS Intelligence Rotational Assignment Program and Law Enforcement Support Act
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026
The bill strengthens U.S. defense readiness, industrial capacity, veteran/family supports, housing recovery, and cybersecurity—at the cost of substantial new spending, added administrative and compliance burdens, constraints on flexibility and some civil‑liberties/privacy tradeoffs, and potential disruptions to research and international economic ties.
Streamlining Procurement for Effective Execution and Delivery and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026
The bill aims to strengthen U.S. military readiness, domestic industrial capacity, and service member supports through sweeping investments and new authorities—but does so at the cost of substantial new federal spending, added bureaucracy, tighter restrictions on research and rights in some areas, and risks of procurement or operational tradeoffs and local disruptions.
ARMOR Act
The bill speeds and streamlines allied defense logistics and cross-border transfers—improving readiness and lowering some costs—while trading off reduced congressional notification, possible security risks from faster approvals, and added administrative burdens without guaranteed new resources.
International Traffic in Arms Regulations Licensing Reform Act
This bill speeds and standardizes export-licensing decisions and strengthens congressional visibility—benefiting exporters and allied security—while increasing agency workload, confidentiality risks, and the chance that expedited or pressured reviews could undermine security and quality of decisions.
Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2025
This bill strengthens Coast Guard personnel, capabilities, victim support, and oversight while improving maritime safety, but does so at significant fiscal and administrative cost and with privacy, procedural, and operational trade‑offs that could burden personnel, operators, and taxpayers.
GENIUS Act
The bill trades broader consumer protections, financial‑stability safeguards, and a clear federal regulatory regime for payment stablecoins against higher compliance costs, reduced competition/innovation (especially for smaller or decentralized projects), greater federal preemption, and privacy/enforcement tradeoffs that may raise fees and limit some cross‑border choices.
Illegal Red Snapper and Tuna Enforcement Act
DETERRENCE Act
The bill strengthens penalties and gives prosecutors clearer tools to punish crimes coordinated by foreign governments—boosting deterrence and protections for officials—while increasing prosecutorial discretion, raising due‑process and evidentiary concerns, and likely adding incarceration and litigation costs for taxpayers.
Strategic Ports Reporting Act
Economic Espionage Prevention Act
The bill strengthens tools to block sensitive technology from reaching Russia and increases congressional oversight, but does so at the cost of higher compliance burdens, diplomatic friction with the PRC, potential due-process and travel impacts, and new regulatory uncertainty for businesses.
Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2025
The bill boosts Coast Guard capacity, personnel supports, victim protections, and maritime/infrastructure modernization—but does so at the cost of substantial new spending, added administrative burdens, and some tradeoffs in privacy, oversight, and regulatory flexibility.
Expressing the sense of the Senate in support of Operation Absolute Resolve.
The resolution strengthens legal backing for sanctions, prosecutions, and border enforcement against the Maduro regime and related criminal networks—improving enforcement capacity—but raises the risk of higher military costs, diplomatic friction, and potential delays to humanitarian recovery.
Celebrating the June 2025 North Atlantic Treaty Organization Summit in the Hague, the Netherlands, and reaffirming priorities pertaining to transatlantic security and our commitment to NATO.
The resolution strengthens NATO coordination, deterrence, and protections for allied infrastructure and Ukraine—but does so at the cost of higher defense commitments that could divert domestic resources, raise taxes, increase escalation risk, and prompt civil‑liberties tradeoffs.
To direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
The resolution increases Congress's control and reduces immediate combat exposure for U.S. forces while preserving limited defensive authority and partner support — at the cost of constraining executive flexibility, creating operational/legal uncertainty, and potentially weakening regional deterrence.
To direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
The bill shifts key decisions about continued U.S. hostilities with Iran from the president to Congress—strengthening legislative oversight and reducing routine combat exposure for troops—while still permitting defensive assistance and evacuations, but it raises risks of escalation, operational uncertainty, economic costs, and continued casualties.
To direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
The resolution trades reduced U.S. troop exposure and stronger congressional oversight for tighter limits on the President’s ability to act quickly with force—lowering direct combat risk while increasing the potential for delayed responses, political friction, costs, and escalation risks tied to allied assistance.
Joint Task Force to Counter Illicit Synthetic Narcotics Act of 2025
The bill centralizes and strengthens federal efforts to disrupt synthetic‑opioid supply chains and coordinate prevention/treatment—potentially saving lives and improving enforcement efficiency—while raising notable costs, civil‑liberty and privacy risks, diplomatic friction, and local compliance/burden concerns that will require careful oversight and safeguards.
Fighter Force Preservation and Recapitalization Act of 2025
The bill increases Air Force and ANG near‑ and long‑term combat capacity and transparency while preserving local squadrons and accelerating modernization, but it does so at higher taxpayer cost, with potential short‑term capability gaps, reduced acquisition flexibility, and some safety and oversight tradeoffs.