Track bills, resolutions, and amendments moving through Congress
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027
The bill substantially strengthens U.S. military readiness, technological defenses, service member benefits, and industrial resilience but does so at the cost of materially higher federal spending, expanded administrative and reporting burdens, procurement and privacy tradeoffs, and several provisions that raise legal and implementation risks.
Major Non-NATO Ally Terror Threat Assessment Act
The bill improves classified, country-specific threat intelligence and forces DHS to identify capability gaps—strengthening congressional oversight and counterterrorism focus—but does so at the cost of increased surveillance/privacy concerns, added government expense, and potential diplomatic and information-security risks.
Condemning the dictator of the People's Republic of China, Xi Jinping, for deceit, undermining prospects for peace and security, and orchestrating crimes against humanity.
The resolution raises important alarms about human-rights abuses, cyber threats, fentanyl flows, and environmental harms linked to PRC activity—potentially strengthening U.S. policy responses—but its strong rhetoric also risks economic retaliation, reduced diplomatic cooperation, harm to U.S.-China business ties, and increased domestic xenophobia.
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026
The bill boosts oversight, targeted defense and foreign-aid investments, and health and program transparency, but does so by locking funds into many earmarks and reporting mandates that increase administrative costs, reduce executive flexibility, raise near‑term taxpayer obligations, and constrain federal personnel and agency responsiveness.
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026
The bill ramps up U.S. defense, maritime, and diplomatic capabilities and invests in domestic industrial resilience and service member support, but does so through large new spending, pervasive reporting mandates, procurement shifts, and authorities that raise taxpayer costs, administrative burdens, privacy risks, and some national‑security tradeoffs.
Strategic Ports Reporting Act
The bill gives federal and state policymakers better, regularly updated visibility into ports tied to PRC actors—improving national-security planning and options to secure supply chains—at the cost of added federal expense, potential operational disruption for ports and businesses, and risks that public disclosures or designations could reveal vulnerabilities or strain diplomacy.
SHIELD Against CCP Act
The bill improves DHS coordination, threat assessments, and privacy safeguards to strengthen border and supply-chain security, but it increases federal costs and raises risks of greater scrutiny, information-sharing, and potential trade enforcement actions while being limited by a seven-year sunset.
Decoupling from Foreign Adversarial Battery Dependence Act
The bill reduces reliance on certain foreign battery suppliers and increases transparency and targeted flexibility for DHS procurement, but does so at the cost of higher procurement complexity and expenses and a measurable risk to operational readiness if replacement batteries are not available.
Celebrating the June 2025 North Atlantic Treaty Organization Summit in the Hague, the Netherlands, and reaffirming priorities pertaining to transatlantic security and our commitment to NATO.
The resolution strengthens NATO coordination, deterrence, and protection of critical infrastructure—bolstering regional and allied security—but does so at the cost of higher defense spending, potential escalation risks, possible tradeoffs with domestic programs, and increased civil liberties concerns.
Affirming that the underlying purpose of the Foreign Emoluments Clause renders the acceptance and transfer of a plane from the government of Qatar, without the explicit consent of Congress, an illegal emolument, withholding the consent of the Senate to the acceptance and transfer of plane from the government of Qatar, and demanding the transfer of any plane received by President Donald J. Trump or entities under his control from the government of Qatar to the permanent control of the United States Government.
The resolution raises oversight and constitutional concerns about accepting a donated presidential plane and could yield short-term procurement savings, but it creates substantial potential taxpayer costs, security risks, and politically charged but nonbinding findings.
Protect America’s Innovation and Economic Security from CCP Act of 2025
The bill strengthens federal efforts to block CCP-linked economic espionage and protect critical infrastructure, but does so at the cost of higher federal spending and risks to academic collaboration, foreign investment, and civil liberties if not carefully implemented and overseen.
United States-Israel Defense Partnership Act of 2025
The bill significantly deepens U.S.–Israel defense collaboration and funds accelerated R&D and deployment of defensive and advanced technologies—boosting military readiness and industrial activity—while increasing federal spending, raising risks of technology exposure and political entanglement, and delaying some near‑term congressional re‑evaluation.
Provide for the delivery of artificial intelligence functional bills of materials, and for other purposes.
The bill improves DoD visibility and security of AI supply chains and drives industry transparency, but imposes compliance burdens that may exclude smaller vendors, raise IP exposure risks, and create administrative costs for the DoD.
Require a drone posture review.
The bill increases visibility into U.S. drone capability gaps and strengthens congressional oversight to guide modernization, at the cost of consuming DoD resources and risking disclosure of sensitive vulnerabilities.
Require the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to submit a strategy for cyber cooperation in the Indo-Pacific region, and for other purposes.
The bill accelerates a coordinated Indo‑Pacific cyber strategy to improve allied interoperability, partner defenses, and funding transparency, but does so at risk of higher defense spending, possible escalation affecting civilian networks, and a potentially rushed strategy due to the short deadline.
Secure A.I. Development Act of 2026
The bill aims to strengthen AI security, incident-sharing, and vulnerability management to protect critical systems and inform policymakers, but it does so by imposing substantial compliance costs, creating secrecy and IP‑exposure risks, and favoring better‑resourced firms — trading broader safety gains for burdens on small developers, potential transparency losses, and short‑term agency strain.
Stop PRC Economic Espionage Act of 2026
The bill tightens U.S. legal tools against economic espionage tied to specified foreign nations—boosting deterrence and remedies for theft—while imposing new compliance risks, higher costs for cross-border business, and civil‑liberties concerns for entities with foreign links.
Cyber Letters of Marque and Reprisal Act
The bill aims to strengthen U.S. cyber defense and speed asset recovery by authorizing and incentivizing private actors to take offensive and recovery actions, trading increased operational flexibility and faster victim recovery for elevated privacy risks, concentrated executive power, reduced civil remedies, and heightened risks of escalation and abuse.
Unmanned System Command and Control Integration Assessment Act of 2026
The bill promotes interoperable, cyber-hardened unmanned-system command-and-control through clearer requirements, independent review, and defined standards—improving military effectiveness and informing civil integration—while shifting costs, imposing recurring compliance and procurement burdens, introducing information-security trade-offs, and risking slower deployments and constrained innovation because implementation must be funded largely from existing RDT&E resources.
Generative AI Terrorism Risk Assessment Act
The bill improves detection, coordination, and definitional clarity around generative-AI terrorist threats—helping federal, state, and local responders—but does so at the cost of greater surveillance risk, potential resource burdens, possible constraints on legitimate AI use, and reduced flexibility or broader oversight in some areas.
Responsible Artificial Intelligence Defense Act of 2026
The bill increases safety, privacy, and oversight of Department of Defense AI and autonomous systems—reducing civil‑liberty and lethal‑use risks—while still allowing accelerated or waived deployments and exemptions that could undermine those protections and raise costs.
HALO Act of 2026
The bill raises DoD AI safety, testing, oversight, and civil‑liberties protections—improving reliability, human control, and transparency—but does so at the cost of higher program and administrative expenses, slower fielding and operational flexibility, and remaining risks from targeted exemptions and disclosure of sensitive vulnerabilities.
NEW HORIZON Act
The bill could improve military decision-making, resilience, and commercial space innovation by testing in-orbit data processing, but it creates significant security, cost, and operational risks that require careful mitigation and oversight.
Ultimate Human Responsibility in Defense Systems Act of 2026
The bill meaningfully increases safety, accountability, training, and oversight of autonomous weapons—reducing unintended harm and legal risk—while imposing higher costs, added bureaucracy, operational constraints in time‑critical scenarios, and potential security/transparency trade‑offs.
Secure and Accountable Military AI Act of 2026
The bill strengthens DoD oversight, human control, and incident reporting for high‑risk military AI—improving safety and accountability—but does so at the cost of significant compliance costs, potential delays to urgent deployments, and renewed civil‑liberty and transparency risks if carve‑outs or classified processes are overbroad.
Unmanned and Autonomous Systems Strategy Act of 2026
The bill strengthens U.S. and allied unmanned-system capabilities and supply‑chain resilience to improve mission effectiveness and maritime safety, but does so at higher taxpayer cost and with risks to privacy, partner diplomacy, and regional stability.
Critical Infrastructure Airspace Defense Act
The bill strengthens protection of energy and other critical infrastructure against hostile drones through funding, certified counter‑UAS authority, and federal coordination—at the cost of increased government spending, operational burdens on operators, potential risks to aviation and public safety, privacy concerns for nearby communities, and reduced legal accountability for authorized actors.
Taiwan Relations Reinforcement Act
The bill improves congressional clarity, oversight, and targeted planning to deter and prepare for gray‑zone threats to Taiwan, but does so at the cost of higher taxpayer spending, reduced public transparency, some legal/oversight uncertainties, and potential risks of escalation or constrained executive agility.
Blue Skies for Taiwan Act of 2026
The bill accelerates PRC‑independent UAS supply chains and U.S.–Taiwan defense industrial cooperation—boosting military security and market opportunities—while raising costs, administrative burdens, and geopolitical and technology‑security risks that could constrain future policy flexibility.
Mined in America Act of 2026
The bill aims to build a domestic crypto‑mining and grid‑interactive compute industrial base, strategic Bitcoin holdings, and regulatory clarity to bolster jobs, security, and grid flexibility — but it does so at the cost of taxpayer exposure to Bitcoin volatility, increased energy use and emissions in some regions, added compliance burdens, and potential market and trade distortions.