Sponsors (133)
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Requires federal agencies that fund, conduct, or oversee scientific research to adopt and publish OSTP-approved scientific integrity policies, appoint career Scientific Integrity Officers, protect researchers’ rights to communicate and publish findings, establish dispute-resolution and training programs, and report publicly on complaints and outcomes. Sets deadlines for adoption and review, gives OSTP an approval and coordination role, allows previously adopted policies to remain if certified, and mandates GAO review of implementation.
This bill strengthens and standardizes protections, oversight, and transparency for federal scientific work—boosting researcher rights and public trust—but it adds administrative costs, centralized reviews that may slow agencies, and some protections or coverage details that remain non‑binding or ambiguous.
Federal scientists, researchers, and contractors will have explicit protections to publish, attend conferences, participate in peer review, and petition Congress without political censorship, strengthening researchers' free‑speech and whistleblowing protections.
Agencies will be required to adopt standardized, OSTP-approved scientific integrity policies and post them publicly, increasing transparency about how scientific work and communications are governed.
Creates career Scientific Integrity Officers at each covered agency, establishes internal dispute resolution and whistleblower protections, and mandates annual reporting and OSTP-led coordination—improving accountability and oversight of misconduct and retaliation claims.
Agencies will incur new administrative and staffing costs to create policies, hire Scientific Integrity Officers, run training, and produce reports, which will increase taxpayer expenses and agency workloads.
Strict protections for nonpolitical personnel communications and publications could complicate agency management of communications that legitimately require review for classified or national‑security reasons, potentially hindering operations.
Centralized OSTP approvals, quinquennial reviews, and required reporting may slow agency responsiveness, create compliance workload, and concentrate oversight in a way that delays decisions.
Introduced February 6, 2025 by Paul Tonko · Last progress February 6, 2025