Sponsors (149)
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Introduced March 5, 2025 by John B. Larson · Last progress March 5, 2025
Prohibits political appointees and special government employees from accessing Social Security beneficiary data systems and creates a private right of action for negligent or unauthorized access or disclosure of Social Security information. Requires the SSA Office of Inspector General to investigate each violation, report quickly to Congress, and requires the Government Accountability Office to study and report on the effects and enforcement of these changes; preserves a specific existing federal regulation text as of January 19, 2025.
The bill strengthens beneficiary privacy and accountability—giving individuals clearer remedies and Congress better oversight—at the cost of higher administrative and litigation burdens, potential delays for officials who lose direct access, and some risk of increased reporting-related exposure or operational strain on agencies.
Social Security beneficiaries (seniors, people with disabilities, Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries) will have reduced risk of insider exposure because political appointees and special government employees are barred from directly accessing SSA beneficiary systems and the bill clarifies which systems are protected.
Individuals whose Social Security information is improperly accessed can sue and recover at least $5,000 per violation and prevailing plaintiffs can recover costs and reasonable attorneys' fees, increasing remedies and deterrence against privacy breaches.
Beneficiaries (especially seniors and people with disabilities) gain faster accountability and better incident handling because the OIG must investigate and report unauthorized disclosures or access quickly and each incident requires a risk assessment.
Taxpayers could face increased litigation costs and payouts if the government is sued for negligent disclosures, and the non‑retroactivity provision may reduce the government's ability to recover from past violations.
SSA, OIG, GAO and congressional committees may incur substantial administrative burdens and costs (mediated access, monthly reporting, investigations, recurring GAO studies) that could require extra resources or divert staff time.
Banning direct access for political appointees and SGEs may slow decision-making and transition briefings that rely on immediate access to beneficiary systems.