Sponsors (185)
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Introduced July 22, 2025 by Ayanna Pressley · Last progress July 22, 2025
Requires that federal health programs, federal providers, and federal health plans cover abortion services and related care for people they insure, enroll, or treat. It defines covered programs broadly (Medicaid, CHIP, Medicare, IHS, VA, TRICARE, FEHB, refugee and immigrant care in federal custody, and others), repeals a specific Affordable Care Act provision, and adds preemption and litigation-related provisions that bar RFRA as a defense against the Act. Also expresses a nonbinding sense of Congress that federal programs should model nationwide abortion coverage and that private-market restrictions should end; preserves state or local laws that provide greater protections; and includes a severability clause. The bill does not specify new funding amounts or an effective date in the text provided.
The bill would expand and clarify federally guaranteed abortion coverage for people served by federal programs—improving access and reducing some disparities—while raising federal costs and inviting significant legal and political conflicts that could delay implementation and create new compliance and religious-liberty tensions.
People enrolled in federal health programs (Medicaid, Medicare, VA, TRICARE, FEHBP, CHIP, IHS) and federal beneficiaries will have explicit, guaranteed coverage of abortion services, reducing ambiguity and direct cost barriers to care.
People served by Indian Health Service and tribal health systems (AIAN individuals) would gain clearer federal coverage for abortion-related care, improving access for Native communities.
Federal law and statutory text would be simplified and clarified (removing obsolete cross‑references and creating a single controlling statute), reducing regulatory ambiguity for insurers, agencies, and plan administrators.
Taxpayers and federal budgets could face higher costs because expanding federally funded abortion coverage across many federal programs would increase federal spending and administrative obligations.
Asserting federal authority to preempt or override state restrictions and superseding conflicting statutes is likely to provoke widespread legal challenges and prolonged litigation, creating uncertainty about when and where access will be available.
Hospitals, clinics, and providers could face operational, compliance, and liability complexities in states with conflicting laws or institutional objections, which may reduce provider participation or complicate care delivery.