Sponsors (153)
Introduced February 6, 2025 by Adriano J. Espaillat · Last progress February 6, 2025
The bill protects people at sensitive locations and increases DHS oversight and training, but it reduces enforcement flexibility, may lead to suppressed evidence and case dismissals, and imposes administrative costs and tight implementation deadlines.
Noncitizens and people at sensitive sites (students, patients, worshippers, courthouse visitors, voters, shelter residents) will be less likely to face immediate immigration enforcement within 1,000 feet of schools, hospitals, places of worship, courthouses, polling places, and shelters.
Immigrants and law enforcement will face fewer risky confrontations because the bill requires supervisory confirmation for enforcement near sensitive sites and requires operations to stop once exigent circumstances end.
Immigrants gain stronger due-process protections because evidence gathered in violation of the sensitive-location rule can be excluded and individuals can move to terminate removal proceedings.
Law enforcement and the public may face increased risk because restrictions could hinder timely immigration arrests in non-exigent situations near sensitive locations, potentially allowing some targets to evade enforcement.
Immigrants and prosecutors may see more dismissal of removal cases because the exclusionary remedies (suppressed evidence and motions to terminate) can reduce successful prosecutions.
Taxpayers and DHS components will incur administrative costs and resource diversion because compliance, reporting, and training requirements impose additional burdens on the agency.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Restricts immigration enforcement at or within 1,000 feet of many named “sensitive locations” (schools, hospitals, places of worship, polling places, courthouses, shelters, etc.), requires supervisory approval for enforcement there unless exigent circumstances exist, and creates reporting, training, and remedies when the rules are violated. It also directs DHS to issue implementing rules within 90 days and takes effect 90 days after enactment.