Sponsors (155)
The bill increases protections, oversight, and procedural safeguards for people at sensitive locations—reducing fear and disruptions—but does so at the cost of constraining immigration enforcement operations, adding administrative burdens, and creating potential delays or legal challenges that could affect public-safety responses.
Immigrants and other people present at schools, hospitals, places of worship, and similar 'sensitive locations' are less likely to face immigration enforcement within 1,000 feet, reducing fear and improving access to services.
People seeking medical care and children attending school will face fewer disruptions and safety risks because officers must act discreetly, limit time on scene, and cease actions once exigent circumstances end.
Enforcement near sensitive sites will have more oversight and consistent practices due to required individual incident reporting, annual reports to Congress and DHS OIG, and mandated annual training for DHS/ICE/CBP personnel.
Law enforcement (ICE/CBP) may be hampered in arresting noncitizens who pose safety or national-security risks near protected sites, because the buffer and approval requirements can delay time-sensitive interventions.
The 1,000-foot buffer and broad definition of protected sites (including public spaces and district offices) may create large enforcement-free zones that complicate routine immigration operations and resource deployment.
Mandated real-time supervisor consultations, 30-day reporting, and record restrictions will add administrative burden and could slow urgent operations, increasing costs for agencies and taxpayers.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Prohibits DHS immigration enforcement at or within 1,000 feet of many defined "sensitive locations" except in narrow exigent or authorized circumstances and requires reporting, training, and inadmissibility of improperly obtained evidence.
Prohibits immigration enforcement by DHS officers and designated individuals at or within 1,000 feet of a broad set of named “sensitive locations” (schools, hospitals, places of worship, courthouses, etc.) except in narrow, defined emergencies or with prior authorization. It requires immediate cessation of enforcement when exigent circumstances end or when there is uncertainty, makes evidence gathered in violation inadmissible in removal proceedings, and creates training, reporting, and rulemaking requirements for DHS.
Introduced February 6, 2025 by Adriano J. Espaillat · Last progress February 6, 2025